...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Item distribution, internal consistency, and structural validity of the German version of the DEMQOL and DEMQOL–proxy
【24h】

Item distribution, internal consistency, and structural validity of the German version of the DEMQOL and DEMQOL–proxy

机译:德文版DEMQOL和DEMQOL-proxy的项目分布,内部一致性和结构有效性

获取原文

摘要

Accurate assessment of health-related quality of life as an endpoint in intervention studies is a major challenge in dementia research. The DEMQOL (29 items) and the proxy version (32 items), which is partly based on the DEMQOL, are internationally used instruments. To date, there is no information on the structural validity, item distribution, or internal consistency for the German language version of these questionnaires. This psychometric study is based on a secondary data analysis of a sample of 201 outpatients with a mild form of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and their informal caregivers. The informal caregivers who were interviewed were involved in the care of the person with AD several times per week. The analysis for the evaluation of the structural validity was performed using Mokken scale analysis. The internal consistency was calculated using the ρ of the Molenaar Sijtsma statistic and Cronbach’s α. For both versions, four subscales were identified: [A] “positive emotions”, [B] “negative emotions”, [C] “physical and cognitive functioning”, and [D] “daily activities and social relationships”. For both instruments, the internal consistency of all subscales was considered “good” (ρ?=?0.71–0.88, α?=?0.72–0.87). The results are a first indication of good construct validity of the instruments used for the German setting. We recommend further investigations of the test-retest reliability and the inter-rater reliability of the proxy instrument.
机译:准确评估作为干预研究终点的健康相关生活质量是痴呆研究的主要挑战。 DEMQOL(29项)和代理版本(32项)(部分基于DEMQOL)是国际上使用的工具。迄今为止,还没有关于这些问卷的德语版本的结构有效性,项目分布或内部一致性的信息。这项心理测量研究基于对201位轻度阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)患者及其非正式护理人员的门诊样本进行的二次数据分析。接受访谈的非正式照料者每周都要对AD患者进行几次护理。使用Mokken量表分析进行结构有效性评估的分析。内部一致性是使用Molenaar Sijtsma统计量的ρ和Cronbach的α计算的。对于这两个版本,确定了四个分量表:[A]“积极情绪”,[B]“消极情绪”,[C]“身体和认知功能”和[D]“日常活动和社会关系”。对于这两种工具,所有子量表的内部一致性都被认为是“良好”(ρ?=?0.71-0.88,α?=?0.72-0.87)。结果首先证明了用于德国环境的仪器具有良好的结构有效性。我们建议对替代工具的重测可靠性和评估者之间的可靠性进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号