...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Psychometric properties of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument: a systematic review
【24h】

Psychometric properties of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument: a systematic review

机译:后期功能和残疾仪器的心理测量特性:系统综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The choice of measure for use as a primary outcome in geriatric research is contingent upon the construct of interest and evidence for its psychometric properties. The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI) has been widely used to assess functional limitations and disability in studies with older adults. The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current available evidence for the psychometric properties of the LLFDI. Methods Published studies of any design reporting results based on administration of the original version of the LLFDI in community-dwelling older adults were identified after searches of 9 electronic databases. Data related to construct validity (convergent/divergent and known-groups validity), test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change were extracted. Effect sizes were calculated for within-group changes and summarized graphically. Results Seventy-one studies including 17,301 older adults met inclusion criteria. Data supporting the convergent/divergent and known-groups validity for both the Function and Disability components were extracted from 30 and 18 studies, respectively. High test-retest reliability was found for the Function component, while results for the Disability component were more variable. Sensitivity to change of the LLFDI was confirmed based on findings from 25 studies. The basic lower extremity subscale and overall summary score of the Function component and limitation dimension of the Disability component were associated with the strongest relative effect sizes. Conclusions There is extensive evidence to support the construct validity and sensitivity to change of the LLFDI among various clinical populations of community-dwelling older adults. Further work is needed on predictive validity and values for clinically important change. Findings from this review can be used to guide the selection of the most appropriate LLFDI subscale for use an outcome measure in geriatric research and practice.
机译:背景技术作为老年医学研究主要结果的测量方法的选择取决于其心理测量特性的兴趣和证据。晚期功能和残疾仪器(LLFDI)已被广泛用于评估老年人研究中的功能限制和残疾。该系统评价的主要目的是评估LLFDI的心理测量特性的当前可用证据。方法通过搜索9个电子数据库,确定了基于LLFDI原始版本管理的社区居住老年人的任何设计报告结果的已发表研究。提取与构建体有效性(趋同/不同和已知群体有效性),重测信度和变化敏感性相关的数据。计算组内变化的效应大小并以图形方式汇总。结果包括17,301名老年人的71项研究符合纳入标准。分别从30和18个研究中提取了支持功能和残疾成分的趋同/趋同和已知组有效性的数据。发现“功能”组件具有较高的重测可靠性,而“残疾”组件的结果则更具可变性。根据来自25个研究的结果,证实了对LLFDI变化的敏感性。基本的下肢分量表和功能组件的总体总分以及残疾组件的限制维度与最强的相对效果大小相关。结论有大量证据支持在社区居住的老年人的各种临床人群中对LLFDI变化的构建效度和敏感性。需要就临床上重要变化的预测效度和价值开展进一步工作。此次审查的结果可用于指导最合适的LLFDI子量表的选择,以用于老年研究和实践中的结果测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号