首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >General practitioners' conceptions about treatment of depression and factors that may influence their practice in this area. A postal survey
【24h】

General practitioners' conceptions about treatment of depression and factors that may influence their practice in this area. A postal survey

机译:全科医生关于抑郁症的观念以及可能影响他们在该领域实践的因素。邮政调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The way GPs work does not appear to be adapted to the needs of depressive patients. Therefore we wanted to examine Swedish GPs' conceptions of depressive disorders and their treatment and GPs' ideas of factors that may influence their manner of work with depressive patients. Methods A postal questionnaire to a stratified sample of 617 Swedish GPs. Results Most respondents assumed antidepressive drugs effective and did not assume that psychotherapy can replace drugs in depression treatment though many of them looked at psychotherapy as an essential complement. Nearly all respondents thought that clinical experiences had great importance in decision situations, but patients' own preferences and official clinical guidelines were also regarded as essential. As influences on their work, almost all surveyed GPs regarded experiences from general practice very important, and a majority also emphasised experiences from private life. Courses arranged by pharmaceutical companies were seen as essential sources of knowledge. A majority thought that psychiatrists did not provide sufficient help, while most respondents perceived they were well backed up by colleagues. Conclusion GPs tend to emphasize experiences, both from clinical work and private life, and overlook influences of collegial dealings and ongoing CME as well as the effects of the pharmaceutical companies' marketing activities. Many GPs appear to need more evidence based knowledge about depressive disorders. Interventions to improve depression management have to be supporting and interactive, and should be combined with organisational reforms to improve co-operation with psychiatrists.
机译:背景全科医生的工作方式似乎无法适应抑郁症患者的需求。因此,我们想研究瑞典全科医生的抑郁症概念及其治疗方法,以及全科医生对可能影响他们与抑郁症患者的工作方式的因素的看法。方法对617名瑞典全科医生的分层样本进行邮政问卷调查。结果大多数受访者认为抗抑郁药是有效的,但并未认为心理疗法可以替代抑郁症治疗药物,尽管许多人将心理疗法视为必不可少的补充。几乎所有受访者都认为临床经验对决策情况非常重要,但是患者自己的偏好和官方临床指南也被认为是必不可少的。作为对其工作的影响,几乎所有接受调查的全科医生都认为来自普通实践的经验非常重要,并且大多数人还强调了私人生活的经验。制药公司安排的课程被视为必不可少的知识来源。大多数人认为精神科医生没有提供足够的帮助,而大多数受访者认为他们得到了同事的良好支持。结论GP倾向于强调临床工作和私人生活中的经验,而忽略了大学间交易和持续的CME的影响以及制药公司营销活动的影响。许多全科医生似乎需要更多有关抑郁症的循证知识。改善抑郁症管理的干预措施必须是支持性和互动性的,应与组织改革相结合以改善与精神科医生的合作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号