首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Knowledge, perceptions, and experiences of family caregivers and home care providers of physical restraint use with home-dwelling elders: a cross-sectional study in Japan
【24h】

Knowledge, perceptions, and experiences of family caregivers and home care providers of physical restraint use with home-dwelling elders: a cross-sectional study in Japan

机译:家庭护理人员和家庭护理提供者与居家长者使用身体约束的知识,看法和经验:日本的横断面研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The use of physical restraints by family caregivers with home-dwelling elders has not been extensively studied but it might be widespread. Furthermore, it is also not clear how home care providers who support family caregivers perceive the use of physical restraint in elders’ homes. This study assessed family caregivers’ and home care providers’ knowledge and perceptions of physical restraint used with elders living at home in Japan, a country with the highest proportion of elders in the world and where family caregiving is common. Methods We undertook a cross-sectional study of 494 family caregivers, 201 home helpers, 78 visiting nurses, 131 visiting physicians, and 158 care managers of home-dwelling frail elders needing some care and medical support in Japan, using questionnaires on knowledge of 11 physical restraint procedures prohibited in institutions and 10 harmful effects of physical restraints, perceptions of 17 reasons for requiring physical restraints, and experiences involving physical restraint use. Results Family caregivers were aware of significantly fewer recognized prohibited physical restraint procedures and recognized harmful effects of physical restraint than home care providers, and differences among home care providers were significant. The average importance rating from 1 (least) to 5 (most) of the 17 reasons for requiring physical restraints was significantly higher among family caregivers than home care providers, and significantly different among the home care providers. Moreover, these differences depended in part on participation in physical restraint education classes. While 20.1% of family caregivers had wavered over using physical restraints, 40.5% of home care providers had seen physical restraints used in elders’ homes and 16.7% had advised physical restraint use or used physical restraints themselves. Conclusions Knowledge and perceptions of physical restraints differed between family caregivers and home care providers and were also diverse among home care providers. Because both groups might be involved in physical restraint use with home-dwelling elders, home care providers should acquire standardized and appropriate knowledge and perceptions of physical restraints to help family caregivers minimize abusive physical restraint use.
机译:背景技术尚未广泛研究家庭照料者与家庭长者对身体约束的使用,但这种方法可能很普遍。此外,还不清楚支持家庭看护人的家庭护理提供者如何看待老年人家中的身体约束。这项研究评估了家庭护理人员和家庭护理提供者对日本在家中老年人所使用的身体约束的知识和看法,日本是世界上老年人比例最高的国家,而且家庭护理很普遍。方法我们采用问卷调查的方式,对日本的494名家庭护理人员,201名家庭护理人员,78名来访护士,131名来访医生和158名需要照顾和医疗支持的体弱长者的护理经理进行了横断面研究。机构中禁止使用物理约束程序,以及物理约束的10种有害影响,17种需要物理约束的原因的理解,以及涉及使用物理约束的经验。结果家庭护理人员意识到,公认的禁忌身体约束程序和公认的身体约束的有害影响要少于家庭护理提供者,而且家庭护理提供者之间的差异也很大。在需要身体约束的17个原因中,从1(最少)到5(最多)的平均重要性等级显着高于家庭护理提供者,并且在家庭护理提供者之间也存在显着差异。此外,这些差异部分取决于参加体育锻炼课程的情况。尽管有20.1%的家庭护理人员动摇了身体约束,但40.5%的家庭护理提供者看到了老人家中使用的物理约束,而16.7%的人建议使用物理约束或自己使用了物理约束。结论家庭护理人员和家庭护理提供者之间对身体约束的认识和理解不同,并且家庭护理提供者之间也存在差异。因为这两个群体都可能与居家长者一起使用身体约束,所以家庭护理提供者应该获得标准化且适当的身体约束知识和观念,以帮助家庭护理人员最大程度地减少滥用身体约束的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号