...
首页> 外文期刊>Beijing Law Review >The Physical-Object Invention and the Material Invention
—Efficient Use of a Categorization Based on Looks (Appearance and Property)
【24h】

The Physical-Object Invention and the Material Invention
—Efficient Use of a Categorization Based on Looks (Appearance and Property)

机译:物理目的发明和物质发明
-基于外观(外观和属性)的分类有效使用

获取原文

摘要

As the way of the categorization of inventions from their appearances and properties, the physical-object invention focuses on the shape and structure of articles, and the material invention focuses on the property and its transformation of articles (the Opinion 1). The author has hitherto proposed the above categorization. In this paper, the ground of the introduction and reasonableness of introducing this categorization into the patent system will be explained in more detail. In addition, the property and its transformation in the material invention and the technical systematization of the contents of the definition of the physical-object/material inventions will be analyzed. The relation of an article and material can be represented by the words “An article comprises materials.” The flow of technical development and formation of inventions will be also explained. The issues, which should be revised, relating to the existing patent examination guidelines and the interpretation of the theory of dividing invention into elements, will be analyzed, using the categorization of physical-object/material inventions. The reason why the PBP Claim can be applied only in the case of material inventions (only in the part of them) will be also shown. On the contrary, the reason why the relation to use other persons patent invention can be applied only in the case of physical-object inventions will be also explained. In this regard, the discussion will be made combining together the author’s another opinion (the Opinion 2) placing the high value on the principle in the analysis of the formation process of inventions, especially in the case by means of experiments, also. Furthermore, the possibility of introducing the categorization of physical-object/material inventions in the way of making inventions will be discussed.
机译:作为从外观和属性对发明进行分类的方法,物理对象发明侧重于物品的形状和结构,而实质性发明侧重于物品的属性及其转换(见解1)。迄今为止,作者已经提出了以上分类。在本文中,将更详细地说明将这种分类引入专利制度的依据和合理性。此外,还将分析物质发明中的特性及其转化,以及对物物/物质发明定义内容的技术系统化。物品和材料之间的关系可以用“一件物品包括材料”来表示。也将说明技术开发和发明形成的流程。将使用物理对象/物质发明的分类来分析与现有专利审查指南和将发明划分为要素的理论有关的应予修订的问题。还说明了仅在重大发明的情况下(仅在部分发明中)适用PBP权利要求的原因。相反,还将说明仅在物理对象发明的情况下可以应用与他人专利发明的关系的原因。在这方面,将结合作者的另一种观点(观点2)进行讨论,在分析发明的形成过程时,特别是在通过实验的情况下,该原理具有很高的价值。此外,将讨论以发明的方式引入物理对象/物质发明的分类的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号