首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Psychometric properties of four fear of falling rating scales in people with Parkinson’s disease
【24h】

Psychometric properties of four fear of falling rating scales in people with Parkinson’s disease

机译:帕金森氏病患者四种担心降低评分量表的心理计量学特征

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Fear of falling (FOF) is commonly experienced in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). It is a predictor of recurrent falls, a barrier to physical exercise, and negatively associated with health-related quality of life. A variety of rating scales exist that assess different aspects of FOF but comprehensive head-to-head comparisons of their psychometric properties in people with PD are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of four FOF rating scales in people with PD. More specifically, we investigated and compared the scales’ data completeness, scaling assumptions, targeting, and reliability. Methods The FOF rating scales were: the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), the Swedish FES (FES(S)), the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale (ABC), and the modified Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (mSAFFE). A postal survey was administered to 174 persons with PD. Responders received a second survey after two weeks. Results The mean (SD) age and PD duration of the 102 responders were 73 (8) and 7 (6) years, respectively. ABC had worse data completeness than the other scales (6.9 vs. 0.9–1.3% missing data). All scales had corrected item-total correlations exceeding 0.4 and showed acceptable reliabilities (Cronbach’s alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) >0.80) but only FES-I had ICC >0.90. The standard error of measurements ranged from 7% (FES-I) to 12% (FES(S)), and the smallest detectable differences ranged from 20% (FES-I) to 33% (FES(S)) of the total score ranges. ABC and FES(S) had substantially more outliers than mSAFFE and FES-I (10 and 15 vs. 3 and 4, respectively) when the two test occasions were compared. Conclusions When assessing FOF in people with PD, the findings in the present study favoured the choice of FES-I or mSAFFE. However, FES-I was the only scale with ICC >0.90 which has been suggested as a minimum when using a scale for individual comparisons.
机译:背景技术帕金森氏病(PD)患者通常会感到摔倒(FOF)。它是反复跌倒的预测指标,是体育锻炼的障碍,并且与健康相关的生活质量呈负相关。存在多种评估FOF各个方面的评分量表,但缺乏对PD患者心理计量学特性的全面正面对比。这项研究的目的是评估PD患者的四种FOF评分量表的心理计量学特性。更具体地说,我们调查并比较了天平的数据完整性,天平假设,目标和可靠性。方法FOF评定量表为:国际跌倒效能量表(FES-1),瑞典FES(FES(S)),特定于活动的平衡信心量表(ABC)以及经修订的“活动与跌倒恐惧调查”在老年人(mSAFFE)中。对174名PD患者进行了邮政调查。响应者在两周后接受了第二次调查。结果102名应答者的平均(SD)年龄和PD持续时间分别为73(8)和7(6)岁。与其他量表相比,ABC的数据完整性更差(丢失的数据分别为6.9和0.9–1.3%)。所有量表均校正了超过0.4的项间总相关性,并显示出可接受的可靠性(Cronbach's alpha和类内相关系数(ICC)> 0.80),但只有FES-1的ICC> 0.90。测量的标准误差范围为总数的7%(FES-I)至12%(FES(S)),最小的可检测差异范围为总数的20%(FES-1)至33%(FES(S))分数范围。比较两个测试时机,ABC和FES(S)的异常值明显高于mSAFFE和FES-1(分别为10和15对3和4)。结论在评估PD患者的FOF时,本研究发现倾向于选择FES-1或mSAFFE。但是,FES-1是唯一的ICC> 0.90的量表,使用该量表进行个人比较时建议将其作为最小值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号