首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Patient-centered professional practice models for managing low back pain in older adults: a pilot randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Patient-centered professional practice models for managing low back pain in older adults: a pilot randomized controlled trial

机译:以患者为中心的专业治疗老年人腰痛的实践模型:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Low back pain is a debilitating condition for older adults, who may seek healthcare from multiple providers. Few studies have evaluated impacts of different healthcare delivery models on back pain outcomes in this population. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of older adults receiving back pain treatment under 3 professional practice models that included primary medical care with or without chiropractic care. We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial with 131 community-dwelling, ambulatory older adults with subacute or chronic low back pain. Participants were randomly allocated to 12?weeks of individualized primary medical care (Medical Care), concurrent medical and chiropractic care (Dual Care), or medical and chiropractic care with enhanced interprofessional collaboration (Shared Care). Primary outcomes were low back pain intensity rated on the numerical rating scale and back-related disability measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included clinical measures, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analyses included mixed-effects regression models and general estimating equations. At 12?weeks, participants in all three treatment groups reported improvements in mean average low back pain intensity [Shared Care: 1.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 2.6; Dual Care: 3.0; 95% CI 2.3 to 3.8; Medical Care: 2.3; 95% CI 1.5 to 3.2)] and back-related disability (Shared Care: 2.8; 95% CI 1.6 to 4.0; Dual Care: 2.5; 95% CI 1.3 to 3.7; Medical Care: 1.5; 95% CI 0.2 to 2.8). No statistically significant differences were noted between the three groups on the primary measures. Participants in both models that included chiropractic reported significantly better perceived low back pain improvement, overall health and quality of life, and greater satisfaction with healthcare services than patients who received medical care alone. Professional practice models that included primary care and chiropractic care led to modest improvements in low back pain intensity and disability for older adults, with chiropractic-inclusive models resulting in better perceived improvement and patient satisfaction over the primary care model alone. Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01312233 , 4 March 2011.
机译:腰痛是老年人的衰弱条件,他们可能会向多家医疗机构寻求医疗服务。很少有研究评估不同医疗保健提供模式对该人群腰痛结局的影响。这项研究的目的是比较在3种专业实践模型下接受背痛治疗的老年人的临床结局,其中包括采用或不采用脊骨疗法的初级医疗护理。我们对131例居住在亚急性或慢性下腰痛的社区居民,门诊老年人进行了一项随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配到为期12周的个性化初级医疗护理(医疗护理),并发医疗和脊椎护理(双重护理)或具有增强的专业间协作的医疗和脊椎护理(共享护理)。主要结果是根据数字评分量表评估的下背痛强度和使用Roland-Morris残疾问卷调查的与背相关的残疾。次要结果包括临床措施,不良事件和患者满意度。统计分析包括混合效应回归模型和一般估计方程。在12周时,所有三个治疗组的参与者均报告了平均平均下腰痛强度得到了改善[共享护理:1.8; 95%置信区间(CI)1.0至2.6;双重护理:3.0; 95%CI 2.3至3.8;医疗:2.3; 95%CI 1.5至3.2)]和背部相关残疾(共享护理:2.8; 95%CI 1.6至4.0;双重护理:2.5; 95%CI 1.3至3.7;医疗服务:1.5; 95%CI 0.2至2.8) 。在主要指标上,三组之间没有发现统计学上的显着差异。与仅接受医疗治疗的患者相比,包括脊椎按摩治疗在内的两种模型的参与者均认为其腰背痛改善,整体健康状况和生活质量以及对医疗保健服务的满意度明显更高。包括初级保健和脊椎治疗的专业实践模型导致老年人的下腰痛强度和残疾程度有所改善,而包括脊椎治疗在内的模型比仅初级保健模型可带来更好的感知改善和患者满意度。 Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT01312233,2011年3月4日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号