首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >How and why community hospital clinicians document a positive screen for intimate partner violence: a cross-sectional study
【24h】

How and why community hospital clinicians document a positive screen for intimate partner violence: a cross-sectional study

机译:一项横断面研究,社区医院的临床医生如何以及为何对亲密伴侣的暴力行为进行正面筛查

获取原文
       

摘要

Background This two-part study examines primary care clinicians' chart documentation and attitudes when confronted by a positive waiting room screen for intimate partner violence (IPV). Methods Patients at community hospital-affiliated health centers completed a screening questionnaire in waiting rooms that primary care providers (PCPs) were subsequently given at the time of the visit. We first reviewed the medical records of patients who screened positive for IPV, evaluating the presence and quality of documentation. Next we administered a survey to PCPs that measured their knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding IPV. Results Seventy-two percent of charts contained some documentation of IPV, however only 10% contained both a referral and safety plan. PCPs were more likely to refer patients (p Conclusion Mandatory waiting room screening for IPV does not result in high levels of referral or safety planning by PCPs. Despite the implementation of a screening process, clinicians lack confidence and time to address IPV in their patient populations suggesting that alternative methods of training and supporting PCPs need to be developed.
机译:背景技术这项由两部分组成的研究考察了面对亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的积极候诊室屏幕时,初级保健临床医生的图表文档和态度。方法社区医院附属健康中心的患者在候诊室完成了一项筛选调查表,随后在就诊时对他们进行了初级保健提供者(PCP)的检查。我们首先审查了对IPV呈阳性筛查的患者的病历,评估了文件的存在和质量。接下来,我们对PCP进行了一项调查,以测量其有关IPV的知识,态度和实践。结果72%的图表包含IPV的一些文档,但是只有10%包含了推荐计划和安全计划。 PCP更有可能转诊患者(p结论强制性的IPV候诊室筛查不会导致PCP进行高水平的转诊或安全计划。尽管实施了筛查过程,临床医生仍缺乏信心和时间来解决患者人群中的IPV建议需要开发替代方法来培训和支持PCP。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号