...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Comparative efficacy of two primary care interventions to assist withdrawal from long term benzodiazepine use: A protocol for a clustered, randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Comparative efficacy of two primary care interventions to assist withdrawal from long term benzodiazepine use: A protocol for a clustered, randomized clinical trial

机译:两种基本护理干预措施有助于长期停用苯二氮卓类药物的比较疗效:一项随机研究的协议

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Although benzodiazepines are effective, long-term use is not recommended because of potential adverse effects; the risks of tolerance and dependence; and an increased risk of hip fractures, motor vehicle accidents, and memory impairment. The estimated prevalence of long-term benzodiazepine use in the general population is about 2,2 to 2,6%, is higher in women and increases steadily with age. Interventions performed by General Practitioners may help patients to discontinue long-term benzodiazepine use. We have designed a trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of two brief general practitioner-provided interventions, based on gradual dose reduction, and will compare the effectiveness of these interventions with that of routine clinical practice. Methods/Design In a three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial, general practitioners will be randomly allocated to: a) a group in which the first patient visit will feature a structured interview, followed by visits every 2-3 weeks to the end of dose reduction; b) a group in which the first patient visit will feature a structured interview plus delivery of written instructions to self-reduce benzodiazepine dose, or c) routine care. Using a computerized pharmaceutical prescription database, 495 patients, aged 18-80 years, taking benzodiazepine for at least 6 months, will be recruited in primary care health districts of three regions of Spain (the Balearic Islands, Catalonia, and Valencia). The primary outcome will be benzodiazepine use at 12 months. The secondary outcomes will include measurements of anxiety and depression symptoms, benzodiazepine dependence, quality of sleep, and alcohol consumption. Discussion Although some interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing benzodiazepine consumption by long-term users, the clinical relevance of such interventions is limited by their complexity. This randomized trial will compare the effectiveness and safety of two complex stepped care interventions with that of routine care in a study with sufficient statistical power to detect clinically relevant differences. Trial Registration Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN13024375
机译:背景技术虽然苯二氮卓类药物有效,但由于潜在的不良反应,不建议长期使用。宽容和依赖的风险;并增加了髋部骨折,机动车事故和记忆障碍的风险。据估计,一般人群中长期使用苯二氮卓的患病率约为2.2至2.6%,女性较高,并且随着年龄的增长而稳定增加。全科医生进行的干预可能有助于患者中止长期使用苯二氮卓类药物。我们设计了一个试验,以逐步减少剂量为基础,评估两种简短的由全科医生提供的干预措施的有效性和安全性,并将这些干预措施与常规临床实践的有效性进行比较。方法/设计在三臂集群随机对照试验中,全科医生将被随机分配到:a)一组患者,其中第一次患者访视将进行结构化访谈,然后每2-3周进行一次随访,直至给药结束减少; b)首次患者就诊的小组,进行结构化访谈,并提供书面说明以自行减少苯二氮卓类药物的剂量,或c)常规护理。使用计算机化的药品处方数据库,将在西班牙三个地区(巴利阿里群岛,加泰罗尼亚和巴伦西亚)的初级保健健康地区招募495位年龄在18-80岁的苯二氮卓类药物至少6个月的患者。主要结局是在12个月使用苯二氮卓类药物。次要结果将包括对焦虑和抑郁症状,对苯二氮卓的依赖性,睡眠质量和饮酒量的测量。讨论尽管已显示某些干预措施可有效减少长期使用者对苯二氮卓的消费,但此类干预措施的临床相关性因其复杂性而受到限制。这项随机试验将在一项具有足够统计能力以检测临床相关差异的研究中,将两种复杂的分步护理干预措施与常规护理的有效性和安全性进行比较。试用注册当前控制的试用:ISRCTN13024375

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号