首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >Threaded biliary inside stents are a safe and effective therapeutic option in cases of malignant hilar obstruction
【24h】

Threaded biliary inside stents are a safe and effective therapeutic option in cases of malignant hilar obstruction

机译:在恶性肺门阻塞的情况下,穿线胆道内支架是一种安全有效的治疗选择

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Although endoscopic biliary stents have been accepted as part of palliative therapy for cases of malignant hilar obstruction, the optimal endoscopic management regime remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of placing a threaded stent above the sphincter of Oddi (threaded inside plastic stents, threaded PS) and compared the results with those of other stent types. Methods Patients with malignant hilar obstruction, including those requiring biliary drainage for stent occlusion, were selected. Patients received either one of the following endoscopic indwelling stents: threaded PS, conventional plastic stents (conventional PS), or metallic stents (MS). Duration of stent patency and the incident of complication were compared in these patients. Results Forty-two patients underwent placement of endoscopic indwelling stents (threaded PS?=?12, conventional PS?=?17, MS?=?13). The median duration of threaded PS patency was significantly longer than that of conventional PS patency (142 vs. 32 days; P?=?0.04, logrank test). The median duration of threaded PS and MS patency was not significantly different (142 vs. 150 days, P?=?0.83). Stent migration did not occur in any group. Among patients who underwent threaded PS placement as a salvage therapy after MS obstruction due to tumor ingrowth, the median duration of MS patency was significantly shorter than that of threaded PS patency (123 vs. 240 days). Conclusions Threaded PS are safe and effective in cases of malignant hilar obstruction; moreover, it is a suitable therapeutic option not only for initial drainage but also for salvage therapy.
机译:背景技术尽管对于恶性肺门梗阻病例,内镜胆道支架已被接受作为姑息治疗的一部分,但最佳内镜治疗方案仍存在争议。在这项研究中,我们评估了将螺纹支架放在Oddi括约肌上方的安全性和有效性(螺纹在塑料支架内部,PS螺纹),并将结果与​​其他类型的支架进行了比较。方法选择恶性肺门梗阻患者,包括需要进行胆道引流以进行支架闭塞的患者。患者接受以下内窥镜留置​​支架之一:螺纹PS,常规塑料支架(常规PS)或金属支架(MS)。比较这些患者的支架通畅时间和并发症发生率。结果42例患者接受了内窥镜留置​​支架置入(螺纹PS == 12,常规PS == 17,MS == 13)。穿通PS通畅的中位持续时间明显长于传统PS通畅的持续时间(142 vs. 32天; P?=?0.04,对数秩检验)。 PS和MS通气的中位持续时间没有显着差异(142天与150天,P = 0.83)。在任何组中都没有发生支架迁移。在由于肿瘤向内生长而在MS梗阻后接受螺纹PS植入作为挽救疗法的患者中,MS通畅的中位持续时间明显短于螺纹PS通畅的中位时间(123比240天)。结论穿线PS治疗恶性肺门梗阻安全有效。此外,它不仅是初期引流的一种合适的治疗选择,而且对于挽救疗法也是一种合适的治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号