...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >‘Sussing that doctor out.’ Experiences and perspectives of people affected by hepatitis C regarding engagement with private general practitioners in South Australia: a qualitative study
【24h】

‘Sussing that doctor out.’ Experiences and perspectives of people affected by hepatitis C regarding engagement with private general practitioners in South Australia: a qualitative study

机译:“请医生出去。”丙型肝炎患者与南澳大利亚州的私人全科医生接触的经验和观点:定性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Australians with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) can access affordable Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA) treatments with high cure rates (>90%), via General Practitioners (GPs). Benefits from this treatment will be maximised if people with HCV readily disclose and engage with private GPs regarding HCV-related issues. Investigating the perceptions and experiences of people affected by HCV with GPs can allow for this pathway to care for HCV to be improved. In 2013–2014, 22 purposively sampled participants from South Australia (SA) were interviewed. They a) had contracted or were at risk of hepatitis C (n?=?10), b) were key workers who had clients affected by HCV (n?=?6), and c) met both a) and b) criteria (n?=?6). The semi-structured interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. People affected by HCV viewed GPs as a source of general healthcare but, due to negative experiences and perceptions, many developed a strategy of “sussing” out doctors before engaging with and disclosing to a GP regarding HCV-related issues. Participants were doubtful about the benefits of engagement and disclosure, and did not assume that they would be provided best-practice care in a non-discriminatory, non-judgemental way. They perceived risks to confidentiality and risks of changes to the care they received from GPs upon disclosure. GPs may need to act in ways that counteract the perceived risks and persuade people affected by HCV of the benefits of seeking HCV-related care.
机译:患有慢性丙型肝炎(HCV)的澳大利亚人可以通过全科医生(GP)获得负担得起的治愈率高(> 90%)的直接作用抗病毒(DAA)治疗。如果丙型肝炎病毒感染者愿意就与丙型肝炎病毒相关的问题公开并与私人全科医生接触,则可以从这种治疗中获得最大收益。调查受全科医生感染的丙型肝炎病毒感染者的看法和经验可以改善这种护理丙型肝炎病毒的途径。在2013–2014年,采访了来自南澳大利亚州(SA)的22名有意抽样的参与者。他们a)染上了丙型肝炎或有患丙型肝炎的风险(n?=?10),b)是受到HCV影响的主要工作人员(n?=?6),并且c)符合a)和b)的标准(n?=?6)。对半结构化访谈进行记录,转录和主题分析。受HCV影响的人们将全科医生视为普通医疗保健的来源,但是由于负面的经验和看法,许多人制定了在与HCV有关的问题与全科医生接触并向其披露之前先“请医生”的策略。参与者对参与和披露的好处表示怀疑,并且没有假设他们将以非歧视,无判断的方式获得最佳实践的照顾。他们意识到了保密的风险以及披露后从全科医生那里获得的护理变更的风险。全科医生可能需要采取抵制已知风险的方式行事,并说服受HCV影响的人们寻求HCV相关护理的好处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号