...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Does training family physicians in shared decision making promote optimal use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections? Study protocol of a pilot clustered randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Does training family physicians in shared decision making promote optimal use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections? Study protocol of a pilot clustered randomised controlled trial

机译:对家庭医生进行共同决策培训是否会促进抗生素在急性呼吸道感染中的最佳使用?一项试验性集群随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background In North America, although it varies according to the specific type of acute respiratory infections (ARI), use of antibiotics is estimated to be well above the expected prevalence of bacterial infections. The objective of this pilot clustered randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to assess the feasibility of a larger clustered RCT aiming at evaluating the impact of DECISION+, a continuing professional development (CPD) program in shared decision making, on the optimal use of antibiotics in the context of ARI. Methods/design This pilot study is a cluster RCT conducted with family physicians from Family Medicine Groups (FMG) in the Quebec City area, Canada. Participating FMG are randomised to an immediate DECISION+ group, a CPD program in shared decision making, (experimental group), or a delayed DECISION+ group (control group). Data collection involves recruiting five patients consulting for ARI per physician from both study groups before (Phase 1) and after (Phase 2) exposure of the experimental group to the DECISION+ program, and after exposure of the control group to the DECISION+ program (Phase 3). The primary outcome measures to assess the feasibility of a larger RCT include: 1) proportion of contacted FMG that agree to participate; 2) proportion of recruited physicians who participate in the DECISION+ program; 3) level of satisfaction of physicians regarding DECISION+; and 4) proportion of missing data in each data collection phase. Levels of agreement of the patient-physician dyad on the Decisional Conflict Scale and physicians' prescription profile for ARI are performed as secondary outcome measures. Discussion This study protocol is informative for researchers and clinicians interested in designing and/or conducting clustered RCT with FMG regarding training of physicians in shared decision making. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00354315
机译:背景技术在北美,尽管根据急性呼吸道感染(ARI)的具体类型而异,但估计抗生素的使用已大大超过预期的细菌感染流行率。该试验性集群随机对照试验(RCT)的目的是评估大型集群RCT的可行性,旨在评估DECISION +(一项持续专业发展计划(CPD)在共同决策中对最佳使用抗生素的影响)。 ARI的背景。方法/设计这项初步研究是与来自加拿大魁北克市地区的家庭医学小组(FMG)的家庭医生进行的一项随机研究。参与的FMG随机分为直接DECISION +组,共享决策中的CPD程序(实验组)或延迟DECISION +组(对照组)。数据收集涉及在实验组接触DECISION +计划之前(阶段1)和之后(阶段2),从两个研究组招募每位医生的ARI咨询患者5名,而对照组在DECISION +计划接触后(阶段3) )。评估更大的RCT可行性的主要结果指标包括:1)同意参与的FMG比例。 2)参与DECISION +计划的已招募医师的比例; 3)医生对DECISION +的满意度; 4)在每个数据收集阶段丢失数据的比例。将患者-医师二元组在“决策冲突量表”上的一致水平以及ARI的医生处方概况作为辅助结果度量。讨论本研究协议对有兴趣与FMG设计和/或进行集群RCT的研究人员和临床医生提供有益的信息,以指导他们进行共同决策方面的医师培训。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00354315

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号