...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study
【24h】

A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study

机译:非工作时间基层医疗机构筛查儿童虐待的方案:一项描述性研究

获取原文

摘要

Background Child abuse is often unrecognized at out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) services. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the screening instrument SPUTOVAMO-R2 for child abuse (checklist), followed by a structured approach (reporting code), at OOH-PC services. The reporting code with five steps should ensure consistent action in case of a suspicion. Methods All children attending one of the five participating OOH-PC services in the region of Utrecht, the Netherlands, in a year time, were included. The checklist is an obligatory field in the electronic patient file and was filled in for all children. In case of a positive checklist, the steps in the reporting code were followed. Additionally, the case was evaluated in a multidisciplinary team to determine the probability of child abuse. Results The checklist was filled in for 50671 children; 108 (0.2?%) were positive. The multidisciplinary team diagnosed child abuse in 24 (22?%) of the 108 positive checklists, and no child abuse in 36 (33?%). Emotional neglect was the most frequent type of abuse diagnosed. For all abused children, care was implemented according to the protocol. The most frequent care given was a referral to the hospital ( N =?7) or contact with child’s own general practitioner ( N =?6). Conclusion A checklist followed by a reporting code guarantees consistent actions and care for children with a suspicion of child abuse. The percentage of positive checklists is lower than expected. Validity of the checklist should be assessed in a diagnostic study.
机译:背景信息在非工作时间的初级保健(OOH-PC)服务中,常常无法识别出虐待儿童的情况。我们研究的目的是评估针对儿童虐待的筛查仪器SPUTOVAMO-R2的临床结果(检查表),然后通过OOH-PC服务评估结构化的方法(报告代码)。包含五个步骤的报告代码应确保在怀疑时采取一致的措施。方法包括所有一年内参加荷兰乌得勒支地区五项OOH-PC服务之一的所有儿童。清单是电子患者档案中的必填字段,适用于所有儿童。如果检查表肯定,则遵循报告代码中的步骤。此外,该案在一个多学科团队中进行了评估,以确定虐待儿童的可能性。结果填写了50671名儿童的检查表。阳性108(0.2%)。多学科团队在108个阳性检查清单中有24个(22%)诊断为虐待儿童,而在36个(33%)中没有虐待儿童。情绪疏忽是被诊断出最常见的虐待类型。对于所有受虐待的儿童,根据协议进行了照料。提供的最频繁的护理是转诊到医院(N =?7)或与孩子自己的全科医生联系(N =?6)。结论附有报告代码的核对表可确保对怀疑有虐待儿童的孩子采取一致的行动并给予照顾。积极检查清单的百分比低于预期。检查表的有效性应在诊断研究中进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号