...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Evolutionary Biology >Long-branch attraction and the phylogeny of true water bugs (Hemiptera: Nepomorpha) as estimated from mitochondrial genomes
【24h】

Long-branch attraction and the phylogeny of true water bugs (Hemiptera: Nepomorpha) as estimated from mitochondrial genomes

机译:从线粒体基因组估计的长枝吸引和真水虫(半翅目:Nepomorpha)的系统发育

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Most previous studies of morphological and molecular data have consistently supported the monophyly of the true water bugs (Hemiptera: Nepomorpha). An exception is a recent study by Hua et al. (BMC Evol Biol 9: 134, 2009) based on nine nepomorphan mitochondrial genomes. In the analysis of Hua et al. (BMC Evol Biol 9: 134, 2009), the water bugs in the group Pleoidea formed the sister group to a clade that consisted of Nepomorpha (the remaining true water bugs) + Leptopodomorpha (shore bugs) + Cimicomorpha (assassin bugs and relatives) + Pentatomomorpha (stink bugs and relatives), thereby suggesting that fully aquatic hemipterans evolved independently at least twice. Based on these results, Hua et al. (BMC Evol Biol 9: 134, 2009) elevated the Pleoidea to a new infraorder, the Plemorpha. Results Our reanalysis suggests that the lack of support for the monophyly of the true water bugs (including Pleoidea) by Hua et al. (BMC Evol Biol 9: 134, 2009) likely resulted from inadequate taxon sampling. In particular, long-branch attraction (LBA) between the distant outgroup taxa and Pleoidea, as well as LBA among taxa in the ingroup, made Nepomorpha appear to be polyphyletic. We used three complementary strategies to test and alleviate the effects of LBA: (1) the removal of distant outgroups from the analysis; (2) the addition of closely related outgroups; and (3) the addition of a mitochondrial genome from a second family of Pleoidea. We also performed likelihood-ratio tests to examine the support for monophyly of Nepomorpha with different combinations of taxa included in the analysis. Furthermore, we found that specimens of Helotrephes sp. were misidentified as Paraplea frontalis (Fieber, 1844) by Hua et al. (BMC Evol Biol 9: 134, 2009). Conclusions All analyses that included the addition of more taxa significantly and consistently supported the placement of Pleoidea within the Nepomorpha (i.e., supported the monophyly of the traditional true water bugs). Our analyses further support a close relationship between Notonectoidea and Pleoidea within Nepomorpha, and the superfamilies Nepoidea, Ochteroidea, Naucoroidea, and Pleoidea are resolved as monophyletic in all trees with strong support. Our results also confirmed that monophyly of Nepomorpha clearly is not refuted by the mitochondrial genome data.
机译:背景技术以往大多数有关形态学和分子数据的研究都一贯支持真正的水虫(半翅目:Nepomorpha)的单生。 Hua等人的最新研究是一个例外。 (BMC Evol Biol 9:134,2009)基于九个内啡肽线粒体基因组。在华等人的分析中。 (BMC Evol Biol 9:134,2009),斑节菌属中的水虫形成了由Nepopheta(其余的真水虫)+ Leptopodomorpha(岸边虫)+ Cimicomorpha(刺客虫和亲戚)组成的姐妹群。 + Pentatomomorpha(臭虫和亲戚),因此表明完全水生半足动物至少独立进化了两次。基于这些结果,华等。 (BMC Evol Biol 9:134,2009)将蛇颈藻提升到新的基础设施,即蝶形蝶。结果我们的重新分析表明,Hua等人缺乏对真正的水虫(包括假单胞菌)的单方面的支持。 (BMC Evol Biol 9:134,2009)可能是由于分类单元采样不足所致。尤其是远处的外群分类群和斑节菌之间的长分支吸引(LBA),以及群内分类群之间的LBA,使中华po看起来是多系的。我们使用了三种补充策略来测试和减轻LBA的影响:(1)从分析中删除遥远的外群; (2)增加密切相关的群体; (3)添加了第二类静脉球菌属的线粒体基因组。我们还进行了似然比测试,以检验分析中包括的不同分类单元组合对Nepomorpha单性的支持。此外,我们发现Helotrephes sp。的标本。被Hua等人误认为是额瘫(Fieber,1844年)。 (BMC Evol Biol 9:134,2009)。结论所有包括增加更多类群的分析均一贯支持将假单胞菌放置在Nepomorpha内(即支持传统真水虫的单本)。我们的分析进一步支持线虫体内的线形菌和蝶形虫之间的密切关系,并且在所有树木的强力支持下,线虫,蝶形纲,蝶形纲和蝶形纲的超科被解析为单系的。我们的研究结果还证实,线粒体基因组数据并没有反驳亚纲的单性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号