首页> 外文期刊>BMC Oral Health >Evaluation of the content quality of websites for recurrent aphthous ulcers and oral lichen planus
【24h】

Evaluation of the content quality of websites for recurrent aphthous ulcers and oral lichen planus

机译:复发性口疮和口腔扁平苔藓网站内容质量评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The Internet is one of the most popular resources for people to obtain medical information; however, only a limited number of studies have reported the quality of the available health information related to oral mucosal diseases. The present study aimed to evaluate the quality of information on websites for recurrent aphthous ulcers (RAU) and oral lichen planus (OLP), in both Chinese and English. Common search engines, BaiDu, Google, and Yahoo in Chinese; and Bing, Google, and Yahoo in English were used to identify websites providing content related to the oral mucosal diseases. The first 100 links for keywords “recurrent aphthous ulcers” and “oral lichen planus” were visited and content was downloaded within 24?h. Two separate trained researchers use the validated DISCERN rating instrument and JAMA benchmarks to evaluate the content. The rating scores were analyzed and the quality was assessed according to the scores and content of websites. A total of 145 websites for RAU and 128 of OLP were analyzed. Based on the DISCERN instrument, the quality of the content in websites for both diseases, whether in English or Chinese, was not high, generally scoring 2 to 3 (max. 5). Only 13 of the RAU websites and 21 of the OLP websites fulfilled the four criteria of the JAMA benchmarks. Generally, the scores of the English websites were higher than those of the Chinese websites. During the twelve searches, only four (Yahoo of RAU in Chinese, Bing and Yahoo of RAU in English, and Google of OLP in Chinese) showed moderate correlation between the website’s ranking and their rating scores. People cannot obtain high quality medical information if they only look at the top ranked sites on the viewing lists. Websites belonging to universities or medical centers had relatively higher scores compared with the others. The quality of the content on websites relating to RAU and OLP in Chinese and English was moderate. More good quality websites and information are needed in the future.
机译:互联网是人们获取医疗信息的最流行资源之一。然而,只有少数研究报告了与口腔粘膜疾病有关的可用健康信息的质量。本研究旨在评估中英文复发性口疮(RAU)和扁平苔藓(OLP)网站信息的质量。常见的中文搜索引擎,百度,谷歌和雅虎;以及Bing,Google和Yahoo用英语来识别提供与口腔粘膜疾病有关的内容的网站。访问了关键词“复发性口疮”和“扁平苔藓”的前100个链接,并在24小时内下载了内容。两名单独的受过训练的研究人员使用经过验证的DISCERN评分工具和JAMA基准来评估内容。分析评分分数,并根据分数和网站内容评估质量。总共分析了145个RAU网站和128个OLP网站。基于DISCERN仪器,两种疾病的网站(无论是英文还是中文)的内容质量都不高,通常得分为2-3(最高5分)。只有13个RAU网站和21个OLP网站符合JAMA基准测试的四个标准。一般而言,英文网站的得分高于中文网站。在这十二次搜索中,只有四个(中文的RAU的Yahoo,英语的RAU的Bing和Yahoo,以及中文的OLP的Google)在网站的排名和评分之间显示出中等程度的相关性。如果人们仅查看查看列表中排名靠前的站点,就无法获得高质量的医疗信息。属于大学或医学中心的网站得分相对较高。与RAU和OLP有关的中英文网站的内容质量中等。将来需要更多优质的网站和信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号