...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Endocrine Disorders >Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis
【24h】

Postoperative tight glycemic control significantly reduces postoperative infection rates in patients undergoing surgery: a meta-analysis

机译:术后严格的血糖控制可显着降低手术患者的术后感染率:一项荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

The benefit results of postoperative tight glycemic control (TGC) were controversial and there was a lack of well-powered studies that support current guideline recommendations. The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched utilizing the key words “Blood Glucose”, “insulin” and “Postoperative Period” to retrieve all randomized controlled trials evaluating the benefits of postoperative TGC as compared to conventional glycemic control (CGC) in patients undergoing surgery. Fifteen studies involving 5053 patients were identified. As compared to CGC group, there were lower risks of total postoperative infection (9.4% vs. 15.8%; RR 0.586, 95% CI 0.504 to 0.680, p?< 0.001) and wound infection (4.6% vs. 7.2%; RR 0.620, 95% CI 0.422 to 0.910, p?=?0.015) in TGC group. TGC also showed a lower risk of postoperative short-term mortality (3.8% vs. 5.4%; RR 0.692, 95% CI 0.527 to 0.909, p?=?0.008), but sensitivity analyses showed that the result was mainly influenced by one study. The patients in the TGC group experienced a significant higher rate of postoperative hypoglycemia (22.3% vs. 11.0%; RR 3.145, 95% CI 1.928 to 5.131, p?< 0.001) and severe hypoglycemia (2.8% vs. 0.7%; RR 3.821, 95% CI 1.796 to 8.127, p?< 0.001) as compared to CGC group. TGC showed less length of ICU stay (SMD, ??0.428?days; 95% CI, ??0.833 to ??0.022?days; p?=?0.039). However, TGC showed a neutral effect on neurological dysfunction (1.1% vs. 2.4%; RR 0.499, 95% CI 0.219 to 1.137, p?=?0.098), acute renal failure (3.3% vs. 5.4%, RR 0.610, 95% CI 0.359 to 1.038, p?=?0.068), duration of mechanical ventilation (p?=?0.201) and length of hospitalization (p?=?0.082). TGC immediately after surgery significantly reduces total postoperative infection rates and short-term mortality. However, it might limit conclusion regarding the efficacy of TGC for short-term mortality in sensitivity analyses. The patients in the TGC group experienced a significant higher rate of postoperative hypoglycemia. This study may suggest that TGC should be administrated under close glucose monitoring in patients undergoing surgery, especially in those with high postoperative infection risk.
机译:术后严格血糖控制(TGC)的益处结果存在争议,并且缺乏有力的研究来支持当前的指南建议。使用关键词“血糖”,“胰岛素”和“术后期”搜索了EMBASE,MEDLINE和Cochrane库数据库,以检索所有评估术后TGC与常规血糖控制(CGC)相比益处的随机对照试验在接受手术的患者中。确定了涉及5053名患者的15项研究。与CGC组相比,术后总感染的风险较低(9.4%对15.8%; RR 0.586,95%CI 0.504至0.680,p <0.001)和伤口感染(4.6%vs. 7.2%; RR 0.620) ,在TGC组中95%CI为0.422至0.910,p?=?0.015)。 TGC还显示出较低的术后短期死亡风险(3.8%比5.4%; RR 0.692,95%CI 0.527至0.909,p?=?0.008),但敏感性分析表明,该结果主要受一项研究的影响。 TGC组患者的术后低血糖发生率显着较高(22.3%vs. 11.0%; RR 3.145,95%CI 1.928至5.131,p?<0.001)和严重的低血糖症(2.8%vs. 0.7%; RR 3.821 ,与CGC组相比,95%CI为1.796至8.127,p 0.001)。 TGC显示ICU停留时间更短(SMD为0.428天; 95%CI为0.833至0.022天; p = 0.039)。但是,TGC对神经功能障碍有中性作用(1.1%vs. 2.4%; RR 0.499,95%CI 0.219至1.137,p?=?0.098),急性肾衰竭(3.3%vs. 5.4%,RR 0.610,95) %CI为0.359至1.038,p≥0.068),机械通气时间(p≥0.201)和住院时间(p≥0.082)。手术后立即进行TGC,可显着降低术后总感染率和短期死亡率。但是,这可能会限制有关敏感性分析中TGC对短期死亡率的功效的结论。 TGC组的患者术后低血糖发生率明显更高。这项研究可能建议对接受手术的患者,尤其是术后感染风险高的患者,应在严密的血糖监测下施用TGC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号