首页> 外文期刊>BMC Endocrine Disorders >Fasting insulin sensitivity indices are not better than routine clinical variables at predicting insulin sensitivity among Black Africans: a clamp study in sub-Saharan Africans
【24h】

Fasting insulin sensitivity indices are not better than routine clinical variables at predicting insulin sensitivity among Black Africans: a clamp study in sub-Saharan Africans

机译:空腹胰岛素敏感性指数在预测黑人非洲人的胰岛素敏感性方面并不优于常规临床变量:一项撒哈拉以南非洲人的钳位研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background We aimed to evaluate the predictive utility of common fasting insulin sensitivity indices, and non-laboratory surrogates [BMI, waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR)] in sub-Saharan Africans without diabetes. Methods We measured fasting glucose and insulin, and glucose uptake during 80/mU/m2/min euglycemic clamp in 87 Cameroonians (51 men) aged (SD) 34.6 (11.4) years. We derived insulin sensitivity indices including HOMA-IR, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), fasting insulin resistance index (FIRI) and glucose-to-insulin ratio (GIR). Indices and clinical predictors were compared to clamp using correlation tests, robust linear regressions and agreement of classification by sex-specific thirds. Results The mean insulin sensitivity was M =?10.5?±?3.2?mg/kg/min. Classification across thirds of insulin sensitivity by clamp matched with non-laboratory surrogates in 30-48% of participants, and with fasting indices in 27-51%, with kappa statistics ranging from ?0.10 to 0.26. Fasting indices correlated significantly with clamp (/r/=0.23-0.30), with GIR performing less well than fasting insulin and HOMA-IR (both p Conclusion Fasting insulin sensitivity indices are modest predictors of insulin sensitivity measured by euglycemic clamp, and do not perform better than clinical surrogates in this population.
机译:背景我们旨在评估普通空腹胰岛素敏感性指数和非实验室替代指标[BMI,腰围(WC)和腰高比(WHtR)]在没有糖尿病的撒哈拉以南非洲人中的预测效用。方法我们对87名喀麦隆人(51名男性)年龄(SD)34.6(11.4)岁的空腹血糖和胰岛素以及80 / mU / m 2 / min正常血糖钳制过程中的葡萄糖摄取进行了测量。我们推导了胰岛素敏感性指数,包括HOMA-IR,定量胰岛素敏感性检查指数(QUICKI),空腹胰岛素抵抗指数(FIRI)和葡萄糖/胰岛素比率(GIR)。使用相关测试,稳健的线性回归和按性别划分的三分之二的分类一致性,比较指标和临床预测指标以进行钳制。结果平均胰岛素敏感性为M =≤10.5≤±≤3.2≤mg/ kg / min。通过钳夹将胰岛素敏感性划分为三分之二,在30-48%的参与者中与非实验室代孕相匹配,禁食指数在27-51%,kappa统计值在0.10至0.26之间。空腹指数与钳制显着相关(/r/=0.23-0.30),GIR的表现低于空腹胰岛素和HOMA-IR(均p结论)空腹胰岛素敏感性指数是通过正常血糖钳制测量的胰岛素敏感性的适度预测指标,并且没有在这个人群中的表现要比临床替代品更好。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号