...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Family Practice >Mapping the coverage of attributes in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective
【24h】

Mapping the coverage of attributes in validated instruments that evaluate primary healthcare from the patient perspective

机译:在经过验证的工具中映射属性的覆盖范围,这些工具可以从患者的角度评估基本医疗保健

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Primary healthcare in developed countries is undergoing important reforms, and these require evaluation strategies to assess how well the population's expectations are being met. Although numerous instruments are available to evaluate primary healthcare (PHC) from the patient perspective, they do not all measure the same range of constructs. To analyze the extent to which important PHC attributes are covered in validated instruments measuring quality of care from the patient perspective. Method We systematically identified validated instruments from the literature and by consulting experts. Using a Delphi consensus-building process, Canadian PHC experts identified and operationally defined 24 important PHC attributes. One team member mapped instrument subscales to these operational definitions; this mapping was then independently validated by members of the research team and conflicts were resolved by the PHC experts. Results Of the 24 operational definitions, 13 were evaluated as being best measured by patients, 10 by providers, three by administrative databases and one by chart audits (some being best measured by more than one source). Our search retained 17 measurement tools containing 118 subscales. After eliminating redundancies, we mapped 13 unique measurement tools to the PHC attributes. Accessibility, relational continuity, interpersonal communication, management continuity, respectfulness and technical quality of clinical care were the attributes widely covered by available instruments. Advocacy, management of clinical information, comprehensiveness of services, cultural sensitivity, family-centred care, whole-person care and equity were poorly covered. Conclusions Validated instruments to evaluate PHC quality from the patient perspective leave many important attributes of PHC uncovered. A complete assessment of PHC quality will require adjusting existing tools and/or developing new instruments.
机译:背景技术发达国家的基本医疗保健正在经历重要的改革,这些改革需要评估策略来评估人们对人口期望的满意程度。尽管从患者的角度来看,有许多可用于评估初级保健(PHC)的仪器,但它们并非都测量相同范围的结构。分析从患者角度衡量医疗质量的经过验证的仪器在何种程度上涵盖了重要的PHC属性。方法我们根据文献和咨询专家系统地确定了经过验证的仪器。加拿大的PHC专家使用Delphi建立共识的过程,确定并在操作上定义了24个重要的PHC属性。一名团队成员将仪器子量表映射到这些操作定义;然后由研究团队成员独立验证此映射,并由PHC专家解决冲突。结果在24个操作定义中,有13个被评估为患者最好的评估方法,有10个由提供者评估,三个由管理数据库评估,还有一个由图表审核评估(有些最好由多个来源评估)。我们的搜索保留了包含118个分量表的17种测量工具。消除冗余后,我们将13种独特的测量工具映射到了PHC属性。可访问性,关系连续性,人际沟通,管理连续性,尊重度和临床护理的技术质量是可用工具广泛涵盖的属性。宣传,临床信息管理,服务的全面性,文化敏感性,以家庭为中心的护理,全人护理和公平都没有得到很好的覆盖。结论从患者角度评估PHC质量的经过验证的仪器尚未发现PHC的许多重要属性。对PHC质量的完整评估将需要调整现有工具和/或开发新工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号