首页> 外文期刊>BMC Oral Health >Comparison of the shaping ability of GT? Series X, Twisted Files and AlphaKite rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals
【24h】

Comparison of the shaping ability of GT? Series X, Twisted Files and AlphaKite rotary nickel-titanium systems in simulated canals

机译:GT的成型能力比较?模拟运河中的X系列,扭曲锉和AlphaKite旋转镍钛系统

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Efforts to improve the performance of rotary NiTi instruments by enhancing the properties of NiTi alloy, or their manufacturing processes rather than changes in instrument geometries have been reported. The aim of this study was to compare in-vitro the shaping ability of three different rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by different manufacturing methods. Methods Thirty simulated root canals with a curvature of 35? in resin blocks were prepared with three different rotary NiTi systems: AK- AlphaKite (Gebr. Brasseler, Germany), GTX- GT? Series X (Dentsply, Germany) and TF- Twisted Files (SybronEndo, USA). The canals were prepared according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Pre- and post-instrumentation images were recorded and assessment of canal curvature modifications was carried out with an image analysis program (GSA, Germany). The preparation time and incidence of procedural errors were recorded. Instruments were evaluated under a microscope with 15?×?magnifications (Carl Zeiss OPMI Pro Ergo, Germany) for signs of deformation. The Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS (Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney U-tests, at a confidence interval of 95%). Results Less canal transportation was produced by TF apically, although the difference among the groups was not statistically significant. GTX removed the greatest amount of resin from the middle and coronal parts of the canal and the difference among the groups was statistically significant (p?p? Conclusion Under the conditions of this study, all rotary NiTi instruments maintained the working length and prepared a well-shaped root canal. The least canal transportation was produced by AK. GTX displayed the greatest cutting efficiency. TF prepared the canals faster than the other two systems.
机译:背景技术已经报道了通过增强NiTi合金的性能或其制造工艺而不是改变仪器几何形状来改善旋转NiTi仪器的性能的努力。这项研究的目的是在体外比较通过不同制造方法生产的三种不同的旋转镍钛器械的成形能力。方法30条模拟的根管,曲率35?用三种不同的旋转NiTi系统制备树脂块:AK- AlphaKite(德国Gebr。Brasseler),GTX-GT ? X系列(德国Dentsply)和TF-Twisted Files(美国SybronEndo) )。运河是根据制造商的说明准备的。记录仪器前和仪器后的图像,并使用图像分析程序(GSA,德国)进行根管曲率修改的评估。记录准备时间和程序错误的发生率。在具有15××放大倍率的显微镜(Carl Zeiss OPMI Pro Ergo,德国)下评估仪器的变形迹象。使用SPSS对数据进行统计分析(Wilcoxon和Mann-Whitney U检验,置信区间为95%)。结果TF根尖产生的根管运输较少,尽管两组之间的差异无统计学意义。 GTX去除了运河中段和冠状部分的最大量树脂,各组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p?p?结论)在本研究条件下,所有旋转NiTi器械均保持工作长度并准备了根管的形状是最小的,AK产生的根管运输最少,GTX切割效率最高,TF比其他两个系统更快地制备了根管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号