首页> 外文期刊>BMC Ophthalmology >Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS? mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS? mini shunt surgery versus trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma: a retrospective comparative study

机译:Ex-PRESS的功效和安全性?微型分流术与小梁切除术治疗新生血管性青光眼:回顾性比较研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the short-term efficacy and safety of Ex-PRESS? mini shunt surgery and trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Patients with NVG who underwent Ex-PRESS? mini shunt surgery or trabeculectomy as a primary glaucoma surgery between March 2013 and October 2015 were included in the study, and their medical charts were retrospectively reviewed. The Ex-PRESS? and trabeculectomy groups included 14 eyes and 30 eyes, respectively. Surgical failure was defined by an intraocular pressure (IOP) of ≥21?mmHg (condition A) or?≥?18?mmHg (condition B); Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess efficacies. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses indicated that the probabilities of success at 1?year for the Ex-PRESS? group were 25.7 and 31.8% based on complete and qualified success under condition A, respectively. The corresponding values for the trabeculectomy group were 47.8 and 69.3%, and there was a significant difference in qualified success with condition A (Fig.?1; P?=?0.018), while there were no significant differences in the other criteria. Ex-PRESS? mini shunt surgery and higher intraocular pressure were independent prognostic factors using Cox proportional hazards model analyses in qualified success as in condition A (P?=?0.012 and 0.0495, respectively). The occurrences of postsurgical hyphema and bleb leaks were significantly higher in the trabeculectomy group (P?=?0.005 and 0.008, respectively). During a 1?year follow-up, Ex-PRESS? mini shunt surgery was a less effective, but safer treatment for NVG compared with trabeculectomy.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估和比较Ex-PRESS?的短期疗效和安全性。微型分流手术和小梁切除术治疗新生血管性青光眼(NVG)。接受过EXPRESS治疗的NVG患者?研究纳入了2013年3月至2015年10月进行的作为主要青光眼手术的微型分流手术或小梁切除术,并对他们的病历进行了回顾性审查。记者?小梁切除术组和小梁切除术组分别包括14眼和30眼。手术失败的定义是眼压(IOP)≥21?mmHg(条件A)或?≥?18?mmHg(条件B); Kaplan–Meier生存分析和多变量Cox比例风险模型用于评估疗效。 Kaplan–Meier生存分析表明,Ex-PRESS在1年内成功的可能性是多少?根据在条件A下的完全和合格成功率,两组分别为25.7和31.8%。小梁切除术组的相应值为47.8%和69.3%,在条件A下合格成功率有显着差异(图1; P = 0.018),而其他标准无显着差异。表现?微型分流手术和较高的眼内压是使用Cox比例风险模型分析获得成功的独立预后因素,与条件A一样(分别为P?=?0.012和0.0495)。小梁切除术组术后出现前房积血和小球渗漏的发生率显着更高(分别为P?= 0.005和0.008)。在1年的随访中,Ex-PRESS?与小梁切除术相比,小型分流术对NVG的疗效较差,但更安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号