...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Oral Health >Shear bond strength between alumina substrate and prosthodontic resin composites with various adhesive resin systems
【24h】

Shear bond strength between alumina substrate and prosthodontic resin composites with various adhesive resin systems

机译:氧化铝基体与义齿修复树脂复合材料与各种粘合树脂体系之间的剪切粘结强度

获取原文

摘要

Background With the increase in demand for cosmetics and esthetics, resin composite restorations and all-ceramic restorations have become an important treatment alternative. Taking into consideration the large number of prosthodontic and adhesive resins currently available, the strength and durability of these materials needs to be evaluated. This laboratory study presents the shear bond strengths of a range of veneering resin composites bonded to all-ceramic core material using different adhesive resins. Methods Alumina ceramic specimens (Techceram Ltd, Shipley, UK) were assigned to three groups. Three types of commercially available prosthodontic resin composites [BelleGlass?, (BG, Kerr, CA, USA), Sinfony? (SF, 3?M ESPE, Dental Products, Germany), and GC Gradia? (GCG, GC Corp, Tokyo, Japan)] were bonded to the alumina substrate using four different adhesive resins. Half the specimens per group (N?=?40) were stored dry for 24?hours, the remaining were stored for 30?days in water. The bonding strength, so-called shear bond strengths between composite resin and alumina substrate were measured. Data were analysed statistically and variations in bond strength within each group were additionally evaluated by calculating the Weibull modulus. Results Bond strengths were influenced by the brand of prosthodontic resin composites. Shear bond strengths of material combinations varied from 24.17?±?3.72–10.15?±?3.69?MPa and 21.20?±?4.64–7.50?±?4.22 at 24?h and 30?days, respectively. BG resin composite compared with the other resin composites provided the strongest bond with alumina substrate (p? Conclusion Within the limitations of this study, the shear bond strengths of composite resins to alumina substrate are related to the composite resins.
机译:背景技术随着对化妆品和美学的需求增加,树脂复合修复体和全陶瓷修复体已成为重要的治疗选择。考虑到目前可获得的大量修复牙齿和粘合树脂,需要评估这些材料的强度和耐久性。这项实验室研究显示了使用不同的粘合剂树脂粘合到全陶瓷芯材上的一系列饰面树脂复合材料的剪切粘合强度。方法将氧化铝陶瓷样品(Techceram Ltd,Shipley,英国)分为三组。三种类型的可商购的牙齿修复树脂复合材料[BelleGlass?,(BG,克尔,加利福尼亚,美国),Sinfony? (SF,3M ESPE,牙科产品,德国)和GC Gradia? (GCG,GC Corp,东京,日本)]使用四种不同的粘合剂树脂粘合到氧化铝基底上。每组一半的标本(N?=?40)干燥保存24小时,其余标本在水中保存30天。测定复合树脂与氧化铝基材之间的结合强度,即所谓的剪切结合强度。对数据进行统计分析,并通过计算威布尔模量另外评估每组内的粘结强度变化。结果粘合强度受修复牙齿树脂复合材料品牌的影响。在24小时和30天时,材料组合的抗剪强度分别为24.17?±?3.72–10.15?±?3.69?MPa和21.20?±?4.64?7.50?±?4.22。 BG树脂复合材料与其他树脂复合材料相比,与氧化铝基材的结合力最强(p?结论)在本研究的范围内,复合树脂与氧化铝基材的剪切粘结强度与复合树脂有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号