首页> 外文期刊>BMC Palliative Care >Examining constipation assessment and management of patients with advanced cancer receiving specialist palliative care: a multi-site retrospective case note review of clinical practice
【24h】

Examining constipation assessment and management of patients with advanced cancer receiving specialist palliative care: a multi-site retrospective case note review of clinical practice

机译:接受专家姑息治疗的晚期癌症患者的便秘评估和治疗检查:临床实践的多点回顾性病例记录

获取原文
           

摘要

Constipation is a common symptom for patients receiving palliative care. Whilst international clinical guidelines are available on the clinical management of constipation for people with advanced cancer receiving specialist palliative care (SPC), the extent to which the guidelines are implemented in practice is unclear. This study aimed to examine clinical practices for the assessment and management of constipation for patients with advanced cancer within inpatient SPC settings. A multi-site retrospective case-note review was conducted, consisting of 150 patient case-notes from three inpatient SPC units across the United Kingdom between August 2016 and May 2017. The variables selected for review were determined by the recommendations within the clinical guidelines. Descriptive statistics, cross tabulation, chi square, and bivariate correlations were used to examine clinical practices compared to policy guidelines for the assessment and management of constipation. Reporting was structured by the STROBE checklist for observational research (Additional File 2). A comprehensive assessment, including a full history and performing a physical exam, was recorded for 109 patients (73%), however, no standardised documentation was utilised. Assessment was nurse led, with variable involvement across sites of other members of the multidisciplinary team (MDT). Education on prevention was documented in 30 (20%) case-notes, and 53% recorded evidence of non-pharmacological intervention. Age, gender, and reason for admission did not impact on the likelihood of receiving a comprehensive assessment, education, or non-pharmacological intervention, however, significant differences were evident between sites. Pharmacological management was well developed and aligned to the guidelines however, 33% of patient case-notes recorded no information on the titration of laxatives. Twelve percent of patients experienced partial or complete bowel obstruction, and management strategies were variable. Constipation management is driven by a pharmacological approach, with little evidence of the implementation of preventative and non-pharmacological strategies. The nurse plays a key coordinating role in assessment; however, involvement and roles of the wider MDT varies. Accurate recording of care is essential when examining clinical practice and identifying areas for improvement. Further education is needed to equip HCPs with the knowledge and skills to ensure consistency in assessment and implementation of appropriate non-pharmacological/ preventative strategies.
机译:便秘是接受姑息治疗的患者的常见症状。尽管国际上有针对患有晚期癌症的患者进行专科姑息治疗(SPC)的便秘临床管理的国际临床指南,但该指南在实践中的实施程度尚不清楚。这项研究旨在检查临床实践,以评估和管理住院SPC内晚期癌症患者的便秘。在2016年8月至2017年5月之间,进行了一项多站点回顾性病例笔记审查,包括来自英国三个住院SPC部门的150个患者病例笔记。选择进行审查的变量由临床指南中的建议决定。与用于评估和管理便秘的政策指南相比,使用描述性统计数据,交叉表,卡方和双变量相关性检查临床实践。报告由STROBE检查表清单组成,用于观察性研究(附加文件2)。记录了109位患者(73%)的全面评估,包括完整的病史和进行身体检查,但未使用任何标准化的文档。评估是由护士领导的,跨学科团队(MDT)其他成员的各个站点参与程度各异。预防教育记录在30(20%)个病例笔记中,而53%记录了非药物干预的证据。年龄,性别和入院原因不会影响接受全面评估,教育或非药物干预的可能性,但是,不同地点之间存在明显差异。药理学管理完善并符合指导原则,但是,33%的患者病例记录没有记录有关泻药滴定的信息。百分之十二的患者经历了部分或完全肠梗阻,并且治疗策略是可变的。便秘管理是由药理学方法驱动的,几乎没有证据表明实施了预防性和非药理学策略。护士在评估中起着关键的协调作用。但是,更广泛的MDT的参与和作用各不相同。在检查临床实践并确定需要改进的地方时,准确记录护理至关重要。需要进行进一步的教育,以使HCP拥有知识和技能,以确保在评估和实施适当的非药物/预防策略方面保持一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号