首页> 外文期刊>BMC Palliative Care >Using motivational interviewing to facilitate death talk in end-of-life care: an ethical analysis
【24h】

Using motivational interviewing to facilitate death talk in end-of-life care: an ethical analysis

机译:使用动机性面试来促进临终关怀中的死亡谈话:一项伦理分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Morbidity arising from unprepared bereavement is a problem that affects close personal relations of individuals at the end-of-life. The bereavement studies literature demonstrates that a lack of preparedness for a loved one’s death is a risk factor for secondary psychological morbidity among survivors. Short awareness time of death negatively correlates to preparedness for bereavement. The absence of disclosure of end-of-life diagnosis and prognosis to close personal relations (‘death talk’) between patients and loved ones, or health professionals and loved ones, may contribute to short awareness time of death. To increase awareness time of death, we might attempt to increase patient first-personal disclosure of end-of-life diagnosis and prognosis to loved-ones, and/or patient consent to health professional disclosure of the same. Interventions based on motivational interviewing in end-of-life care whose aim is to facilitate death talk, either by the patient directly, or by a health professional with the patient’s consent, may offer a part solution to the problem of unprepared bereavement. This paper evaluates the ethical permissibility of such interventions. We consider two ethical objections to using motivational interviewing in this way: first, that it is inappropriate for practitioners to seek disclosure as an outcome in this setting; second, that aiming at disclosure risks manipulating individuals into death talk. While it need not be impermissible to direct individuals toward disclosure of end-of-life diagnosis/prognosis, the objection from manipulation implies that it is pro tanto ethically preferable to use motivational interviewing in a non-directive mode in death talk conversations. However, insofar as non-directive motivational interviewing requires more advanced skills, and thus may be more difficult to learn and to practise, we advance that it may be ethically permissible, all things considered, to employ directional, or specific outcome-oriented, motivational interviewing. Motivational interviewing interventions in end-of-life care whose aim is to facilitate death talk, either by the patient directly, or by a health professional with the patient’s consent may be ethically permissible, all things considered.
机译:因未做好的丧亲而产生的发病率是一个问题,它影响着生命尽头的亲密个人关系。丧亲研究文献表明,对亲人的死亡缺乏准备是幸存者继发心理疾病的危险因素。短的死亡意识时间与丧亲的准备负相关。如果没有披露终止生命的诊断和预后以关闭患者与亲人之间或健康专业人员与亲人之间的人际关系(“死亡谈话”),可能会导致死亡的时间缩短。为了增加对死亡的了解时间,我们可能会尝试增加患者对亲人的生命终结诊断和预后的第一人称披露,和/或患者对健康专业披​​露的知情同意。以临终关怀中的动机访谈为基础的干预措施,其目的是促进患者直接进行死亡谈话,或者由患者或在患者同意的情况下由卫生专业人员进行,可能会为未做好的丧亲之痛问题提供部分解决方案。本文评估了此类干预措施的伦理允许性。我们考虑以这种方式使用动机性面试的两个伦理学反对意见:第一,在这种情况下,从业人员寻求披露是不合适的;其次,以公开为目的的冒险有可能使个人陷入死亡讨论。虽然不一定非要引导个人披露临终诊断/预后,但来自操纵的异议意味着从道德上讲,在死亡谈话中以非指导性方式使用动机性访谈在角度上是更可取的。但是,由于非指导性的动机面试需要更高级的技能,因此可能更难于学习和实践,我们认为,从所有方面考虑,采用定向的或特定于结果的,动机性的动机在道德上是允许的面试考虑到所有因素,出于道德上的考虑,对终止生命的护理进行动机性访谈干预的目的是由患者直接或经患者同意的卫生专业人员进行死亡交谈。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号