...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Ophthalmology >Colour Doppler analysis of ophthalmic vessels in the diagnosis of carotic artery and retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma: systematic review of test accuracy studies
【24h】

Colour Doppler analysis of ophthalmic vessels in the diagnosis of carotic artery and retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma: systematic review of test accuracy studies

机译:眼部血管的彩色多普勒分析在颈动脉和视网膜静脉阻塞,糖尿病性视网膜病变和青光眼的诊断中:测试准确性研究的系统综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Colour Doppler analysis of ophthalmic vessels has been proposed as a promising tool in the diagnosis of various eye diseases, but the available diagnostic evidence has not yet been assessed systematically. We performed a comprehensive systematic review of the literature on the diagnostic properties of Colour Doppler imaging (CDI) assessing ophthalmic vessels and provide an inventory of the available evidence. Methods Eligible papers were searched electronically in (Pre) Medline, Embase and Scopus, and via cross-checking of reference lists. The minimum requirement to be included was the availability of original data and the possibility to construct a two-by-two table. Study selection, critical appraisal using the QUADAS II instrument and extraction of salient study characteristics was made in duplicate. Sensitivity and specificity was computed for each study. Results We included 11 studies (15 two-by-two tables) of moderate methodological quality enrolling 820 participants (range 30 to 118). In 44.4% participants were female (range 37–59% in specific subgroups). CDI was assessed for internal carotid stenosis, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, and branch or central retinal vein occlusion diagnosis. There was insufficient data to pool the results for specific illnesses. For the assessments of ophthalmic arteries, mean sensitivity was 0.69 (range 0.27–0.96) with a corresponding mean specificity of 0.83 (range 0.70–0.96). Mean sensitivity of the central retinal artery assessments was 0.58 (range 0.31–0.84) and the corresponding mean specificity was 0.82 (range 0.63–0.94). Conclusions Robust assessments of the diagnostic value of colour Doppler analysis remain uncommon, limiting the possibilities to extrapolate its true potential for clinical practice. PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014014027.
机译:背景技术已提出对眼科血管进行彩色多普勒分析作为诊断各种眼部疾病的有前途的工具,但是尚未对可用的诊断依据进行系统的评估。我们对彩色多普勒成像(CDI)评估眼科血管诊断特性的文献进行了全面的系统综述,并提供了可用证据的清单。方法在(Pre)Medline,Embase和Scopus中以电子方式检索合格的论文,并通过对参考文献列表进行交叉核对。包含的最低要求是原始数据的可用性以及构建两两表的可能性。一式两份进行研究选择,使用QUADAS II仪器进行的关键评估以及重要研究特征的提取。计算每项研究的敏感性和特异性。结果我们纳入了11项方法学质量中等的研究(15项两两表),招募了820名参与者(范围为30至118)。在44.4%的参与者中,女性是女性(特定亚组的范围为37–59%)。 CDI用于评估颈内动脉狭窄,糖尿病性视网膜病变,青光眼以及视网膜分支或视网膜中央静脉阻塞的诊断。没有足够的数据来汇总特定疾病的结果。对于眼动脉评估,平均敏感性为0.69(范围0.27-0.96),相应的平均特异性为0.83(范围0.70-0.96)。视网膜中央动脉评估的平均敏感性为0.58(范围0.31-0.84),相应的平均特异性为0.82(范围0.63-0.94)。结论对彩色多普勒分析的诊断价值进行可靠评估的情况鲜见,这限制了推断其在临床实践中的真正潜力的可能性。 PROSPERO 2014:CRD42014014027。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号