...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Ophthalmology >Repeatability of intraocular pressure measurements with Icare PRO rebound, Tono-Pen AVIA, and Goldmann tonometers in sitting and reclining positions
【24h】

Repeatability of intraocular pressure measurements with Icare PRO rebound, Tono-Pen AVIA, and Goldmann tonometers in sitting and reclining positions

机译:使用Icare PRO反弹仪,Tono-Pen AVIA和Goldmann眼压计在坐姿和卧姿中进行眼内压测量的可重复性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Icare PRO (ICP) is a new Rebound tonometer that is able to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) in both sitting and reclining positions. In this study, the gold standard Goldmann tonometer (GAT) was compared to ICP and Tono-Pen AVIA (TPA). Hypothesis was that repeatability of GAT is superior to ICP and TPA. Methods 36 eyes of 36 healthy caucasian individuals, 13 male and 26 females, 17 right and 19 left eyes have been included in this prospective, randomized, cross-sectional study. The study was conducted at a single site (Dept. of Ophthalmology, UniversityHospital Zurich, Switzerland). Primary outcome measures were Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and coefficients of variation (COV) and test-retest repeatability as visualized by Bland-Altman analysis. Secondary outcome measures were IOP in sitting (GAT, ICP and TPA) and in reclining (ICP and TPA) position. Results Mean IOP measured by GAT was 14.9±3.5 mmHg. Mean IOP measured by ICP was 15.6±3.1 mmHg (with TPA 14.8±2.7 mmHg) in sitting and 16.5±3.5 mmHg (with TPA 17.0±3.0 mmHg) in reclining positions. COVs ranged from 2.9% (GAT) to 6.9% (ICP reclining) and ICCs from 0.819 (ICP reclining) to 0.972 (GAT). Conclusions Repeatability is good with all three devices. GAT has higher repeatability compared to the two tested hand-held devices with lowest COVs and highest ICCs. IOP was higher in the reclining compared to the sitting position. Trial registration The study was registered to the Clinical Trials Register of the US National Institute of Health, NCT01325324 .
机译:背景技术Icare PRO(ICP)是一种新的回弹眼压计,能够测量坐姿和卧姿的眼压(IOP)。在这项研究中,将金标准戈德曼眼压计(GAT)与ICP和Tono-Pen AVIA(TPA)进行了比较。假设是GAT的可重复性优于ICP和TPA。方法这项前瞻性,随机,横断面研究纳入了36名健康的白种人个体中的36眼,男性13例,女性26例,右眼17眼和左眼19眼。这项研究是在一个地点(瑞士苏黎世大学医院眼科)进行的。主要的结局指标是班内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(COV),以及通过Bland-Altman分析显示的重测重复性。次要结果指标是坐位(GAT,ICP和TPA)和斜躺(ICP和TPA)的IOP。结果通过GAT测得的平均眼压为14.9±3.5 mmHg。 ICP测定的坐姿平均IOP为15.6±3.1 mmHg(TPA为14.8±2.7 mmHg),斜躺位置为16.5±3.5 mmHg(TPA 17.0±3.0 mmHg)。 COV范围从2.9%(GAT)到6.9%(ICP倾斜),ICC范围从0.819(ICP倾斜)到0.972(GAT)。结论这三种器件的重复性都很好。与两个测试的最低COV和最高ICC的手持设备相比,GAT具有更高的可重复性。与坐姿相比,斜躺的IOP更高。试验注册该研究已注册到美国国立卫生研究院的临床试验注册处(NCT01325324)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号