...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >The Nuremberg Code subverts human health and safety by requiring animal modeling
【24h】

The Nuremberg Code subverts human health and safety by requiring animal modeling

机译:纽伦堡守则通过要求动物造型来破坏人类健康和安全

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The requirement that animals be used in research and testing in order to protect humans was formalized in the Nuremberg Code and subsequent national and international laws, codes, and declarations. Discussion We review the history of these requirements and contrast what was known via science about animal models then with what is known now. We further analyze the predictive value of animal models when used as test subjects for human response to drugs and disease. We explore the use of animals for models in toxicity testing as an example of the problem with using animal models. Summary We conclude that the requirements for animal testing found in the Nuremberg Code were based on scientifically outdated principles, compromised by people with a vested interest in animal experimentation, serve no useful function, increase the cost of drug development, and prevent otherwise safe and efficacious drugs and therapies from being implemented.
机译:背景技术在《纽伦堡守则》及随后的国家和国际法律,守则和声明中,对动物必须用于研究和测试以保护人类的要求已正式确立。讨论我们回顾了这些要求的历史,并将通过科学了解的动物模型知识与现在的知识进行了对比。我们进一步分析动物模型作为人类对药物和疾病反应的测试对象时的预测价值。我们探索在毒性测试中使用动物模型的情况,以此作为使用动物模型问题的一个示例。总结我们得出的结论是,《纽伦堡守则》中对动物测试的要求是基于科学过时的原则,受到对动物实验有既得利益的人们的折衷,没有任何有用的功能,增加了药物开发的成本,并防止了其他安全有效的方法药物和疗法的实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号