首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cardiovascular Disorders >Factors associated with door-in to door-out delays among ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada
【24h】

Factors associated with door-in to door-out delays among ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada

机译:ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者因初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗转入门到出门延迟的相关因素:加拿大安大略省一项基于人群的队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Compared to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients who present at centres with catheterization facilities, those transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have substantially longer door-in to door-out (DIDO) times, where DIDO is defined as the time interval from arrival at a non-PCI hospital, to transfer to a PCI hospital. We aimed to identify potentially modifiable factors to improve DIDO times in Ontario, Canada and to assess the impact of DIDO times on 30-day mortality. A population-based, retrospective cohort study of 966 STEMI patients transferred for primary PCI in Ontario in 2012 was conducted. Baseline factors were examined across timely DIDO status. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine independent predictors of timely DIDO as well as the association between DIDO times and 30-day mortality. The median DIDO time was 55?min, with 20.1% of patients achieving the recommended DIDO benchmark of ≤30?min. Age (OR?75 vs 18–55 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16–0.56), symptom-to-first medical contact (FMC) time (OR61-120mins vs 120mins vs 90?min had significantly higher adjusted 30-day mortality rates (OR 2.82, 95% CI:1.10–7.19). While benchmark DIDO times were still rarely achieved in the province, we identified several potentially modifiable factors in the STEMI system that might be targeted to improve DIDO times. Our findings that patients who received a pre-hospital ECG were still being transferred to non-PCI capable centres suggest strategies addressing this gap may improve patient outcomes.
机译:与在中心设有导管插入设施的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者相比,那些经原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)转移的患者门入门到门出(DIDO)时间要长得多,其中DIDO被定义为从到达非PCI医院到转移到PCI医院的时间间隔。我们旨在确定潜在的可修改因素,以改善加拿大安大略省的DIDO时间,并评估DIDO时间对30天死亡率的影响。于2012年在安大略省对966名STEMI患者进行了基于人群的回顾性队列研究。在及时的DIDO状态下检查了基线因素。多元logistic回归用于检验及时DIDO的独立预测因素以及DIDO时间与30天死亡率之间的关联。 DIDO中位时间为55分钟,有20.1%的患者达到建议的DIDO基准≤30分钟。年龄(OR>?75 vs 18-55 0.30,95%CI:0.16-0.56),症状至首次医疗联系(FMC)时间(OR61-120mins vs 120mins vs 90?min)调整后30天死亡率明显更高率(OR 2.82,95%CI:1.10–7.19)虽然在省内仍很少达到基准DIDO时间,但我们在STEMI系统中发现了几个可能可修改的因素,可能旨在改善DIDO时间。接受院前心电图检查的患者仍在转移至无PCI功能的中心,这表明解决这一差距的策略可能会改善患者的预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号