...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >Community involvement in biomedical research conducted in the global health context; what can be done to make it really matter?
【24h】

Community involvement in biomedical research conducted in the global health context; what can be done to make it really matter?

机译:社区参与在全球卫生背景下进行的生物医学研究;如何使它变得真正重要?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Community involvement in research has been advocated by researchers, communities, regulatory agencies, and funders with the aim of reinforcing subjects’ protection and improving research efficiency. Community involvement also has the potential to improve dissemination, uptake, and implementation of research findings. The fields of community based participatory research conducted with indigenous populations and of participatory action research offer a large base of experience in community involvement in research. Rules on involving the population affected when conducting research have been established in these fields. But what is the role of community engagement in clinical research and observational studies conducted in biomedical research outside of these specific areas? More than 20?years ago, in the field of HIV medicine, regulatory bodies and funding agencies (such as the US National Institutes of Health) recommended the constitution of a formal organism, the Community Advisory Board (CAB), as part of the study requirements for HIV trials. More recently, CABs have been adopted and used in other fields of medical research, such as malaria. CABs are not without limitations, however, and there is little research on the effectiveness of their use in achieving community protection and participation. Nevertheless, CABs could be a model to import into clinical trials and observational research where no alternative model of community representation is currently being used. Allocating more resources to training and shifting more power to community representatives could be part of the solution to current CAB limitations. However, for researchers to be able to apply these recommendations on community involvement, certain conditions need to be met. In particular, funding agencies need to recognize the human and financial resources required for serious community involvement, and the academic environment needs to take community involvement into account when appraising, mentoring, and training researchers.
机译:研究人员,社区,监管机构和资助者一直提倡社区参与研究,以加强受试者的保护并提高研究效率。社区的参与也有可能改善研究结果的传播,吸收和实施。与土著居民进行的基于社区的参与式研究和参与式行动研究的领域为社区参与研究提供了丰富的经验基础。在这些领域中已经建立了有关在研究过程中涉及受影响人群的规则。但是,在这些特定领域之外,社区参与在生物医学研究中进行的临床研究和观察性研究中的作用是什么? 20多年前,在艾滋病毒医学领域,监管机构和资助机构(例如美国国立卫生研究院)建议组成正式生物体,即社区咨询委员会(CAB),作为研究的一部分HIV试验的要求。最近,CAB已被用于其他医学研究领域,例如疟疾。但是,CAB并非没有局限性,关于其在实现社区保护和参与方面的有效性的研究很少。然而,CAB可以成为导入临床试验和观察研究的模型,而目前尚无替代的社区代表模型在使用。为培训当前的CAB限制,可以分配更多的资源来培训和将更多的权力转移给社区代表。但是,要使研究人员能够将这些建议应用于社区参与,就需要满足某些条件。特别是,供资机构需要认识到社区认真参与所需的人力和财力,并且在评估,指导和培训研究人员时,学术环境需要考虑社区的参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号