首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >A phase II study evaluating neo-/adjuvant EIA chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma
【24h】

A phase II study evaluating neo-/adjuvant EIA chemotherapy, surgical resection and radiotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma

机译:II期研究评估高危软组织肉瘤的新/辅助EIA化疗,手术切除和放疗

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The role of chemotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcoma is controversial. Though many patients undergo initial curative resection, distant metastasis is a frequent event, resulting in 5-year overall survival rates of only 50-60%. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX) has been applied to achieve pre-operative cytoreduction, assess chemosensitivity, and to eliminate occult metastasis. Here we report on the results of our non-randomized phase II study on neo-adjuvant treatment for high-risk STS. Method Patients with potentially curative high-risk STS (size ≥ 5 cm, deep/extracompartimental localization, tumor grades II-III [FNCLCC]) were included. The protocol comprised 4 cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (EIA, etoposide 125 mg/m2 iv days 1 and 4, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 iv days 1 - 4, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 day 1, pegfilgrastim 6 mg sc day 5), definitive surgery with intra-operative radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy and 4 adjuvant cycles of EIA. Result Between 06/2005 and 03/2010 a total of 50 subjects (male = 33, female = 17, median age 50.1 years) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 30.5 months. The majority of primary tumors were located in the extremities or trunk (92%), 6% originated in the abdomen/retroperitoneum. Response by RECIST criteria to neo-adjuvant CTX was 6% CR (n = 3), 24% PR (n = 12), 62% SD (n = 31) and 8% PD (n = 4). Local recurrence occurred in 3 subjects (6%). Distant metastasis was observed in 12 patients (24%). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 2 years was 83% and 68%, respectively. Multivariate analysis failed to prove influence of resection status or grade of histological necrosis on OS or DFS. Severe toxicities included neutropenic fever (4/50), cardiac toxicity (2/50), and CNS toxicity (4/50) leading to CTX dose reductions in 4 subjects. No cases of secondary leukemias were observed so far. Conclusion The current protocol is feasible for achieving local control rates, as well as OS and DFS comparable to previously published data on neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting. However, the definitive role of chemotherapy remains unclear in the absence of large, randomized trials. Therefore, the current regimen can only be recommended within a clinical study, and a possibly increased risk of secondary leukemias has to be taken into account. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01382030 , EudraCT 2004-002501-72
机译:背景化学疗法在高危软组织肉瘤中的作用是有争议的。尽管许多患者接受了初步的根治性切除,但远处转移是一个经常发生的事件,导致5年总生存率仅为50-60%。已应用新辅助化疗和辅助化疗(CTX)来实现术前细胞减少,评估化学敏感性和消除隐匿性转移。在这里,我们报告了针对高危STS的新辅助治疗的非随机II期研究结果。方法包括具有潜在治愈性高危STS(尺寸≥5 cm,深部/腔外定位,II-III级[FNCLCC])的患者。该方案包括4个周期的新辅助化疗(EIA,依托泊苷iv第1天和第4天125 mg / m 2 第4和第4天,如果异环磷酰胺1500 mg / m 2 第1-4天,阿霉素50 mg / m 2 第1天,pegfilgrastim 6 mg sc第5天),确定性手术,包括术中放疗,辅助放疗和4个EIA辅助周期。结果在06/2005和03/2010之间,总共招募了50名受试者(男= 33,女= 17,中位年龄50.1岁)。中位随访时间为30.5个月。大多数原发性肿瘤位于四肢或躯干(92%),6%起源于腹部/腹膜后腹膜。 RECIST标准对新辅助CTX的反应为6%CR(n = 3),24%PR(n = 12),62%SD(n = 31)和8%PD(n = 4)。 3名受试者(6%)发生局部复发。在12例患者中观察到远处转移(24%)。 2年时的总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)分别为83%和68%。多因素分析未能证明切除状态或组织学坏死程度对OS或DFS的影响。严重毒性包括中性粒细胞减少症(4/50),心脏毒性(2/50)和中枢神经系统毒性(4/50),导致4名受试者的CTX剂量降低。到目前为止,未发现继发性白血病病例。结论目前的方案对于实现局部控制率以及OS和DFS是可行的,与以前发表的关于这种情况下新/辅助化疗的数据相当。然而,在缺乏大型随机试验的情况下,化学疗法的确切作用尚不清楚。因此,目前的治疗方案只能在临床研究中推荐,并且必须考虑可能增加的继发性白血病风险。试用注册ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01382030,EudraCT 2004-002501-72

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号