...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Comparing the case mix and survival of women receiving breast cancer care from one private provider with other London women with breast cancer: pilot data exchange and analyses
【24h】

Comparing the case mix and survival of women receiving breast cancer care from one private provider with other London women with breast cancer: pilot data exchange and analyses

机译:比较一位私人提供者与其他伦敦乳腺癌女性接受乳腺癌治疗的女性的病例组合和生存率:试点数据交换和分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Data from providers of private cancer care are not yet formally included in English cancer registration data. This study aimed to test the exchange of breast cancer data from one Hospital Corporation of America International (HCAI) hospital in London with the cancer registration system and assess the suitability of these data for comparative analyses of case mix and adjusted survival. Methods Data on 199 London women receiving ‘only HCAI care’, 278 women receiving ‘some HCAI care’ (HCAI and other services), and 31,234 other London women diagnosed between 2005 and 2011 could be identified and compared. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression was used to adjust for age, socioeconomic deprivation, year of diagnosis, stage of disease and recorded treatment. Results Women receiving ‘only HCAI care’ were younger, lived in areas of higher affluence (47.8?% vs 27.6?%) and appeared less likely to be recorded as having screen-detected (2.5?% vs 25.0?%) disease than other London women. Women receiving ‘some HCAI care’ were more similar to ‘HCAI only’ women. Although HCAI stage of disease data completeness improved during the study period, this was less complete overall than cancer registration data and limited the comparative survival analyses. An apparent survival advantage for ‘HCAI only’ women compared with other London women (hazard ratio 0.48, 95?% confidence interval (CI): 0.32-0.74) was attenuated and no longer statistically significant after adjustment (0.79, 95?% CI: 0.51-1.21). Women receiving ‘some HCAI care’ appeared to have higher survival (hazard ratio 0.24, 95?% CI 0.14-0.41) which was attenuated to 0.48 (95?% CI: 0.28-0.80) in the fully adjusted model. Conclusions Exchange of data between the private cancer sector and the English cancer registration service can identify patients who receive all or some private care. The better survival of women receiving only or some HCAI breast cancer care appears to be at least partly explained by demographic, disease, and treatment factors. However, larger studies using similarly quality assured datasets and more complete staging data from the private sector are needed to produce definitive comparative results.
机译:来自私人癌症护理提供者的背景数据尚未正式包括在英国癌症注册数据中。这项研究的目的是测试伦敦一家美国国际医院公司(HCAI)医院与癌症登记系统之间的乳腺癌数据交换,并评估这些数据是否适合进行病例组合比较和调整生存率的比较。方法可以识别和比较2005年至2011年之间被诊断为199名接受“仅HCAI护理”的伦敦女性,278名接受“某些HCAI护理”(HCAI和其他服务)的女性以及31,234名其他伦敦女性的数据。使用Kaplan-Meier方法评估总生存期,并使用Cox回归来调整年龄,社会经济剥夺,诊断年份,疾病阶段和治疗记录。结果接受“仅HCAI护理”的女性较年轻,生活在富裕程度较高的地区(47.8%vs 27.6%),与其他人群相比,被筛查出疾病的可能性更低(2.5 %% vs 25.0%)伦敦妇女。接受“某些HCAI护理”的女性与“仅HCAI”女性更为相似。尽管在研究期间疾病数据完整性的HCAI阶段有所改善,但总体上不如癌症登记数据完整,并且限制了比较生存率分析。与其他伦敦女性相比,“仅HCAI”女性的明显生存优势(危险比0.48,95%置信区间(CI):0.32-0.74)减弱,调整后不再具有统计学意义(0.79,95%CI: 0.51-1.21)。接受“某些HCAI护理”的女性似乎具有更高的生存率(危险比0.24,95%CI为0.14-0.41),在完全调整的模型中,该比例降低至0.48(95%CI:0.28-0.80)。结论私人癌症部门和英国癌症注册服务机构之间的数据交换可以确定接受全部或部分私人护理的患者。仅接受或部分接受HCAI乳腺癌治疗的妇女的更好生存似乎至少部分由人口统计学,疾病和治疗因素来解释。但是,需要使用质量类似的有保证数据集的较大规模研究和来自私营部门的更完整的分期数据,才能得出确定的比较结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号