...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Importance of hereditary and selected environmental risk factors in the etiology of inflammatory breast cancer: a case-comparison study
【24h】

Importance of hereditary and selected environmental risk factors in the etiology of inflammatory breast cancer: a case-comparison study

机译:遗传性和选定的环境危险因素在炎症性乳腺癌的病因学中的重要性:病例对照研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background To assess the importance of heredity in the etiology of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), we compared IBC patients to several carefully chosen comparison groups with respect to the prevalence of first-degree family history of breast cancer. Methods IBC cases ( n =?141) were compared to non-inflammatory breast cancer cases ( n =?178) ascertained through George Washington University (GWU) with respect to the prevalence of first-degree family history of breast cancer and selected environmental/lifestyle risk factors for breast cancer. Similar comparisons were conducted with subjects from three case–control studies: breast cancer cases ( n =?1145) and unaffected controls ( n =?1142) from the Cancer Genetic Markers of Susceptibility (CGEMS) study, breast cancer cases ( n =?465) and controls ( n =?9317) from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, and ovarian cancer cases ( n =?260) and controls ( n =?331) from a study by University of Toronto (UT). Results The frequency of first-degree breast cancer family history among IBC cases was 17.0?% compared to 24.4?% for GWU breast cancer cases, 23.9?% and 17.9?% for CGEMS breast cancer cases and controls, respectively, 16.9?% and 12.6?% for WHI breast cancer cases and controls, respectively, and 24.2?% and 11.2?% for UT ovarian cancer cases and controls, respectively. IBC cases had a significantly lower prevalence of parous women than WHI breast cancer cases (OR?=?0.46, 95 % CI:0.27–0.81) and controls (OR?=?0.31, 95 % CI:0.20–0.49). Oral contraceptive use was significantly higher among IBC cases compared to WHI breast cancer cases (OR?=?7.77, 95 % CI:4.82–12.59) and controls (OR?=?8.14, 95 % CI:5.28–12.61). IBC cases had a significantly higher frequency of regular alcohol consumption (≥1 drink per day) compared to WHI controls (OR?=?1.84, 95 % CI:1.20–2.82) and UT controls (OR?=?1.86, 95 % CI:1.07–3.22) and higher (statistically non-significant) prevalence (21.3?%) compared to breast cancer cases from GWU (18.2?%) and WHI (15.2?%). Conclusions The prevalence of first-degree breast cancer family history among IBC cases was lower compared to breast and ovarian cancer cases but higher than unaffected individuals. Our multiple-case inflammatory and non-inflammatory breast cancer families may reflect aggregation of common genetic and/or environmental factors predisposing to both types of breast cancer. Our findings that oral contraceptive use and regular alcohol consumption may be associated with IBC warrant further investigations.
机译:背景为了评估遗传因素在炎症性乳腺癌(IBC)病因中的重要性,我们就一级乳腺癌家族史的患病率将IBC患者与几个精心选择的比较组进行了比较。方法将通过乔治华盛顿大学(GWU)确定的IBC病例(n =?141)与非炎症性乳腺癌病例(n =?178)进行比较,以了解一级乳腺癌家族史的患病率以及所选的环境/生活方式是乳腺癌的危险因素。对来自三个病例对照研究的受试者进行了类似的比较:乳腺癌病例(n = 1145)和癌症易感性遗传标记(CGEMS)研究的未受影响对照(n = 1142),乳腺癌病例(n =? 465(女性)和对照组(n =?9317)来自妇女健康倡议(WHI)的研究,卵巢癌病例(n = = 260)和对照(n =?331)来自多伦多大学(UT)的研究。结果IBC病例中一级乳腺癌家族史的发生率为17.0%,而GWU乳腺癌为24.4%,CGEMS乳腺癌和对照组分别为23.9%和17.9%,CGEM乳腺癌和对照组分别为16.9%和17.9%。 WHI乳腺癌病例和对照分别为12.6%和UT卵巢癌病例和对照分别为24.2%和11.2%。与WHI乳腺癌病例(OR = 0.46,95%CI:0.27 – 0.81)和对照组(OR = 0.31,95%CI:0.20 – 0.49)相比,IBC病例的同伴妇女患病率明显更低。与WHI乳腺癌病例(OR?=?7.77,95%CI:4.82-12.59)和对照组(OR?=?8.14,95%CI:5.28-12.61)相比,IBC病例中口服避孕药的使用率明显更高。与WHI对照(OR?=?1.84,95%CI:1.20–2.82)和UT对照(OR?=?1.86,95%CI)相比,IBC病例的定期饮酒(每天≥1次饮酒)的频率明显更高。 :1.07–3.22)和GWU(18.2%)和WHI(15.2%)的乳腺癌病例相比,患病率更高(统计上不显着)(21.3%)。结论与乳腺癌和卵巢癌病例相比,IBC病例中一级乳腺癌家族史的患病率较低,但高于未受影响的个体。我们的多病例炎性和非炎性乳腺癌家族可能反映了两种遗传性乳腺癌易感性的常见遗传和/或环境因素的聚集。我们的发现口服避孕药和经常饮酒可能与IBC有关的发现值得进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号