首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Patient preferences for palliative treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: a choice-based conjoint analysis study from Germany
【24h】

Patient preferences for palliative treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: a choice-based conjoint analysis study from Germany

机译:姑息治疗局部晚期或转移性胃癌和胃食管连接处腺癌的患者偏爱:来自德国的基于选择的联合分析研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Decisions on palliative chemotherapy (CT) for locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) require trade-offs between potential benefits and risks for patients. Healthcare providers and payers agree that patient-preferences should be considered. We conducted a choice-based conjoint (CBC) analysis study in pre-treated patients from Germany with mGC or locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (mGEJ-Ca), to evaluate their preferences when hypothetically selecting a CT regimen. Methods German oncologists and gastroenterologists were contacted to identify patients with mGC or mGEJ-Ca who had completed ≥2?cycles of palliative CT in first or later lines of therapy (CT ongoing or complete). The primary objective was to quantify patient preferences for palliative CT by CBC analysis. Six in-depth qualitative interviews identified 3 attributes: treatment tolerability, quality of life in terms of ability of self-care, and additional survival benefit. The CBC matrix was constructed with 4 factor levels per attribute and each participant was presented with 15 different iterations of these levels. A minimum of 50 participants was needed. Consenting patients completed the CBC survey, choosing systematically among profiles. CBC models were estimated by multinomial logistic regression (MLR) and hierarchical Bayesian (HB) analysis. Estimates of importance for each attribute and factor-level were calculated. Results Fifty-five patients participated in the CBC survey (78.2% male, median age 63?years, 81.8% currently receiving CT). Across this sample, low treatment toxicity was ranked highest (44.6% relative importance, MLR analysis), followed by ability to self-care (32.3%), and an additional survival benefit of up to 3?months (3?months 23.1%, 2?months 18.3%, 1?month 11.2%). The MLR analysis showed high validity (certainty 37.9%, chi square p Conclusions Patients’ preferences related to a new hypothetical palliative CT of mGC or mGEJ-Ca can be assessed by CBCanalysis. Although in real-life, patients initially need to decide on CT before they have any experience, and patients’ varied experiences with CT will have impacted specific responses, low toxicity and self-care ability were considered as most important by this group of patients with mGC or mGEJ-Ca.
机译:背景技术对于局部晚期或转移性胃癌(mGC)的姑息化疗(CT)决策需要在患者的潜在收益和风险之间进行权衡。医疗保健提供者和付款人同意应考虑患者的偏爱。我们对来自德国的mGC或胃食管连接处局部晚期或转移性腺癌(mGEJ-Ca)的预治疗患者进行了基于选择的联合(CBC)分析研究,以评估假设选择CT方案时他们的偏好。方法与德国的肿瘤科医生和肠胃科医生联系,以鉴定在第一或以后的治疗(完成或完成的CT)中完成姑息性CT≥2个周期的mGC或mGEJ-Ca患者。主要目的是通过CBC分析量化患者对姑息性CT的偏爱。六次深入的定性访谈确定了3个属性:治疗耐受性,自我护理能力方面的生活质量以及其他生存益处。构建CBC矩阵,每个属性具有4个因子级别,并且为每个参与者显示15个不同级别的迭代。最少需要50名参与者。同意患者完成了CBC调查,系统地选择了个人资料。 CBC模型是通过多项逻辑回归(MLR)和层次贝叶斯(HB)分析进行估计的。计算每个属性和因子水平的重要性估计。结果55名患者参加了CBC调查(男性78.2%,中位年龄63岁,目前接受CT检查的占81.8%)。在该样本中,低毒性治疗的排名最高(相对重要性,MLR分析为44.6%),其次为自我护理能力(32.3%),以及高达3个月(3个月)的额外生存收益(23.1%, 2个月18.3%,1个月11.2%)。 MLR分析显示出很高的有效性(肯定性37.9%,卡方p结论)可以通过CBCanalysis评估患者对新假设的mGC或mGEJ-Ca姑息性CT的偏爱。尽管在现实生活中,患者最初需要决定CT在他们有任何经验之前,患者在CT方面的不同经验将影响具体反应,这组mGC或mGEJ-Ca患者认为低毒性和自我护理能力最为重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号