...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >A simple method for co-segregation analysis to evaluate the pathogenicity of unclassified variants; BRCA1 and BRCA2 as an example
【24h】

A simple method for co-segregation analysis to evaluate the pathogenicity of unclassified variants; BRCA1 and BRCA2 as an example

机译:共分离分析的一种简单方法,用于评估未分类变体的致病性;以BRCA1和BRCA2为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Assessment of the clinical significance of unclassified variants (UVs) identified in BRCA1 and BRCA2 is very important for genetic counselling. The analysis of co-segregation of the variant with the disease in families is a powerful tool for the classification of these variants. Statistical methods have been described in literature but these methods are not always easy to apply in a diagnostic setting. Methods We have developed an easy to use method which calculates the likelihood ratio (LR) of an UV being deleterious, with penetrance as a function of age of onset, thereby avoiding the use of liability classes. The application of this algorithm is publicly available http://?www.?msbi.?nl/?cosegregation . It can easily be used in a diagnostic setting since it requires only information on gender, genotype, present age and/or age of onset for breast and/or ovarian cancer. Results We have used the algorithm to calculate the likelihood ratio in favour of causality for 3 UVs in BRCA1 (p.M18T, p.S1655F and p.R1699Q) and 5 in BRCA2 (p.E462G p.Y2660D, p.R2784Q, p.R3052W and p.R3052Q). Likelihood ratios varied from 0.097 ( BRCA2 , p.E462G) to 230.69 ( BRCA2 , p.Y2660D). Typing distantly related individuals with extreme phenotypes (i.e. very early onset cancer or old healthy individuals) are most informative and give the strongest likelihood ratios for or against causality. Conclusion Although co-segregation analysis on itself is in most cases insufficient to prove pathogenicity of an UV, this method simplifies the use of co-segregation as one of the key features in a multifactorial approach considerably.
机译:背景对BRCA1和BRCA2中鉴定的未分类变体(UV)的临床意义进行背景评估对于遗传咨询非常重要。变异与疾病在家庭中的共分离分析是对这些变异进行分类的有力工具。统计方法已在文献中进行了描述,但这些方法并非总是易于在诊断环境中应用。方法我们开发了一种易于使用的方法,该方法可以计算UV有害的似然比(LR),其渗透率随发病年龄的变化而变化,从而避免使用责任类别。该算法的应用程序可以从http://?www。?msbi。?nl /?cosegregation上获得。由于它仅需要有关性别,基因型,当前年龄和/或乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌发病年龄的信息,因此可以轻松地用于诊断环境。结果我们已经使用该算法计算了BRCA1(p.M18T,p.S1655F和p.R1699Q)中3个UV和BRCA2(p.E462G p.Y2660D,p.R2784Q,p .R3052W和p.R3052Q)。可能性比从0.097(BRCA2,p.E462G)到230.69(BRCA2,p.Y2660D)不等。输入具有极端表型的远距离相关个体(即,非常早发病的癌症或年老的健康个体)提供的信息最多,并为因果关系提供最强的似然比。结论尽管在大多数情况下,对自身的共分离分析不足以证明紫外线的致病性,但这种方法大大简化了将共分离用作多因素方法的关键特征之一的使用。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号