...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Cancer >Long-term results of chemoradiotherapy for stage II-III thoracic esophageal cancer in a single institution after 2000 -with a focus on comparison of three protocols-
【24h】

Long-term results of chemoradiotherapy for stage II-III thoracic esophageal cancer in a single institution after 2000 -with a focus on comparison of three protocols-

机译:2000年以后,在单一机构中对II-III期胸段食管癌进行放化疗的长期结果-重点是三种方案的比较-

获取原文

摘要

Background To evaluate the long-term results of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage II-III thoracic esophageal cancer mainly by comparing results of three protocols retrospectively. Methods Between 2000 and 2012, 298 patients with stage II-III thoracic esophageal cancer underwent CRT. Patients in Group A received two cycles of cisplatin (CDDP) at 70?mg/m2 (day 1 and 29) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 700?mg/m2/24?h (day 1–4 and 29–32) with radiotherapy (RT) of 60?Gy without a break. Patients in Group B received two cycles of CDDP at 40?mg/m2 (day 1, 8, 36 and 43) and 5-FU at 400?mg/m2/24?h (day 1–5, 8–12, 36–40 and 43–47) with RT of 60?Gy with a 2-week break. Patients in Group C received two cycles of nedaplatin at 70?mg/m2 (day 1 and 29) and 5-FU at 500?mg/m2/24?h (day 1–4 and 29–32) with RT of 60–70?Gy without a break. Differences in prognostic factors between the groups were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The 5-year overall survival rates for patients in Group A, Group B and Group C were 52.4, 45.2 and 37.2?%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients in Stage II, Stage III (non-T4) and Stage III (T4) were 64.0, 40.1 and 22.5?%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients who received 1?cycle and 2?cycles of concomitant chemotherapy were 27.9 and 46.0?%, respectively. In univariate analysis, stage, performance status and number of concomitant chemotherapy cycles were significant prognostic factors ( p Conclusions The protocol used in Group A may be an effective protocol of CRT for esophageal cancer. It may be important to complete the scheduled concomitant chemotherapy with the appropriate intensity of CRT.
机译:背景:主要通过回顾性比较三种方案的结果,评估II期至III期胸段食管癌的放化疗(CRT)的长期结果。方法在2000年至2012年之间,对298例II-III期胸段食管癌患者进行了CRT。 A组患者接受两个周期的70?mg / m 2 (第1和29天)和5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)的700?mg / m 两个周期的治疗2 / 24?h(1-4天和29-32天),放疗(RT)为60?Gy,不间断。 B组患者接受了两个周期的CDDP,分别为40?mg / m 2 (第1、8、36和43天)和5-FU,其剂量为400?mg / m 2 / 24?h(第1–5、8–12、36–40和43–47天),RT为60?Gy,休息2周。 C组患者接受了两个疗程的奈达铂,分别为70?mg / m 2 (第1天和第29天)和5-FU,分别为500?mg / m 2 / 24? h(第1-4天和第29-32天),RT为60-70?Gy,不间断。通过单因素和多因素分析分析两组之间的预后因素差异。结果A组,B组和C组患者的5年总生存率分别为52.4%,45.2%和37.2%。 II期,III期(非T4)和III期(T4)患者的5年总生存率分别为64.0%,40.1%和22.5%。接受1?周期和2?周期化疗的患者的5年总生存率分别为27.9%和46.0%。在单因素分析中,分期,表现状态和伴随化疗次数是重要的预后因素(p结论A组方案可能是食管癌CRT的有效方案。适当的CRT强度。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号