首页> 外文期刊>BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine >Hypnotic relaxation results in elevated thresholds of sensory detection but not of pain detection
【24h】

Hypnotic relaxation results in elevated thresholds of sensory detection but not of pain detection

机译:催眠放松导致感觉检测阈值升高,但疼痛检测阈值升高

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Many studies show an effectiveness of hypnotic analgesia. It has been discussed whether the analgesic effect is mainly caused by the relaxation that is concomitant to hypnosis. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of hypnotic relaxation suggestion on different somatosensory detection and pain thresholds. Methods Quantitative sensory testing (QST) measurements were performed before and during hypnosis in twenty-three healthy subjects on the dorsum of the right hand. Paired t-test was used to compare threshold changes. The influence of hypnotic susceptibility was evaluated by calculating correlation coefficients for threshold changes and hypnotic susceptibility (Harvard group scale). Results During hypnosis significantly changed somatosensory thresholds (reduced function) were observed for the following sensory detection thresholds: Cold Detection Threshold (CDT), Warm Detection Threshold (WDT), Thermal Sensory Limen (TSL) and Mechanical Detection Threshold (MDT). The only unchanged sensory detection threshold was Vibration Detection Threshold (VDT). No significant changes were observed for the determined pain detection thresholds (Cold Pain Thresholds, Heat Pain Thresholds, Mechanical Pain Sensitivity, Dynamic Mechanical Allodynia, Wind-up Ratio and Pressure Pain Threshold). No correlation of hypnotic susceptibility and threshold changes were detected. Conclusion Hypnotic relaxation without a specific analgesic suggestion results in thermal and mechanical detection, but not pain threshold changes. We thus conclude that a relaxation suggestion has no genuine effect on sensory pain thresholds. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier:NCT02261155 (9th October 2014).
机译:背景许多研究表明催眠镇痛是有效的。已经讨论了镇痛作用是否主要由催眠伴随的松弛引起。本研究旨在评估催眠放松建议对不同体感检测和疼痛阈值的影响。方法对23名健康受试者右手背上的催眠前后进行定量感觉测试(QST)。配对t检验用于比较阈值变化。催眠敏感性的影响通过计算阈值变化和催眠敏感性的相关系数(哈佛大学量表)进行评估。结果在催眠过程中,观察到以下感官检测阈值的体感阈值发生了明显变化(功能降低):冷感阈值(CDT),温感阈值(WDT),热感阈值(TSL)和机械感测阈值(MDT)。唯一不变的感觉检测阈值是振动检测阈值(VDT)。对于确定的疼痛检测阈值(冷痛阈值,热痛阈值,机械痛敏性,动态机械异常性疼痛,上肢比率和压力痛阈值),未观察到明显变化。未检测到催眠药敏性和阈值变化的相关性。结论没有特定镇痛提示的催眠放松可导致热和机械检测,但不会引起疼痛阈值变化。因此,我们得出结论,放松建议对感觉疼痛阈值没有真正的影响。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT02261155(2014年10月9日)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号