首页> 外文期刊>BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine >An interpretive review of consensus statements on clinical guideline development and their application in the field of traditional and complementary medicine
【24h】

An interpretive review of consensus statements on clinical guideline development and their application in the field of traditional and complementary medicine

机译:关于临床指南制定的共识声明及其在传统和补充医学领域中的应用的解释性综述

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Despite ongoing consumer demand and an emerging scientific evidence-base for traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM), there remains a paucity of reliable information in standard clinical guidelines about their use. Often T&CM interventions are not mentioned, or the recommendations arising from these guidelines are unhelpful to end-users (i.e. patients, practitioners and policy makers). Insufficient evidence of efficacy may be a contributing factor; however, often informative recommendations could still be made by drawing on relevant information from other avenues. In light of this, the aim of this research was to review national and internationally endorsed consensus statements for clinical guideline developers, and to interpret how to apply these methods when making recommendations regarding the use of T&CM. Method The critical interpretive review method was used to identify and appraise relevant consensus statements published between 1995 and 2015. The statements were identified using a purposive sampling technique until data saturation was reached. The most recent edition of a statement was included in the analysis. The content, scope and themes of the statements were compared and interpreted within the context of the T&CM setting; including history, regulation, use, emerging scientific evidence-base and existing guidelines. Results Eight consensus statements were included in the interpretive review. Searching stopped at this stage as no new major themes were identified. The five themes relevant to the challenges of developing T&CM guidelines were: (1) framing the question; (2) the limitations of using an evidence hierarchy; (3) strategies for dealing with insufficient, high quality evidence; (4) the importance of qualifying a recommendation; and (5) the need for structured consensus development. Conclusion Evidence regarding safety, efficacy and cost effectiveness are not the only information required to make recommendations for clinical guidelines. Modifying factors such as burden of disease, magnitude of effect, current use, demand, equity and ease of integration should also be considered. Uptake of the recommendations arising from this review are expected to result in the development of higher quality clinical guidelines that offer greater assistance to those seeking answers about the appropriate use of T&CM.
机译:背景技术尽管消费者的需求不断增长,并且传统和补充医学(T&CM)的科学证据不断涌现,但标准临床指南中仍然缺乏有关其使用的可靠信息。通常不会提及T&CM干预措施,或者这些指南中提出的建议对最终用户(即患者,从业者和政策制定者)​​无济于事。疗效证据不足可能是一个因素。但是,通常仍可以通过借鉴其他途径的相关信息来提供有益的建议。有鉴于此,本研究的目的是回顾国内和国际认可的临床指南制定者的共识声明,并解释在提出有关T&CM使用的建议时如何应用这些方法。方法采用关键解释性审查方法来识别和评估1995年至2015年之间发布的相关共识声明。使用有目的的抽样技术来识别声明,直到达到数据饱和为止。分析中包括了最新版本的声明。陈述的内容,范围和主题在传统与传统的背景下进行了比较和解释;包括历史,法规,使用,新兴的科学证据基础和现有指南。结果解释性评价包括8篇共识性声明。由于未发现新的主要主题,搜索在此阶段停止了。与制定T&CM指南的挑战相关的五个主题是:(1)提出问题; (2)使用证据等级制度的局限性; (3)处理不足,高质量证据的策略; (4)推荐的重要性; (5)需要进行结构化的共识开发。结论关于安全性,有效性和成本效益的证据并不是为临床指南提出建议所需的唯一信息。还应考虑修改因素,例如疾病负担,影响程度,当前用途,需求,公平性和融合容易程度。预期通过本综述获得的建议将导致开发更高质量的临床指南,从而为寻求正确使用T&CM的人提供更大的帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号