首页> 外文期刊>BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine >Questions about complementary and alternative medicine to the Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centres in Norway (RELIS): a descriptive pilot study
【24h】

Questions about complementary and alternative medicine to the Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centres in Norway (RELIS): a descriptive pilot study

机译:有关挪威地区药品信息和药物警戒中心(RELIS)的补充和替代药物的问题:描述性先导研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Provision of clinically relevant information about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to health care professionals is not well described. The aim of the study was to assess questions about CAM to the Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centres in Norway (RELIS). Methods All question-answers pairs (QAPs) in the RELIS database indexed with alternative medicine from 2005-2010 constituted the study material. A randomly selected sample of 100 QAPs was characterized with regard to type of question (category, patient-specific or general), occupation and workplace of enquirer, the type of information search performed (simple or advanced), and if the answers contained information to provide factual or consultative replies (facts about or advice on clinical use of CAM, respectively). Proportions were compared with Fisher’s exact test with significance at the 0.05 level. Results One thousand and thirty-eight (7.7%) out of 13 482 questions involved CAM. Eighty-two out of 100 questions concerned products containing one or more herbs, vitamins and minerals as well as other substances. Thirty-eight out of 100 questions concerned the category documentation (substance identification and/or literature reports about clinical effects), 36 interactions, 16 adverse effects, 9 pregnancy and lactation, and 1 question concerned contraindications. Sixty-three questions were patient-specific and 37 general. Fifty-four questions came from physicians, 33 from pharmacists and 13 from others (including nurses, midwives, students, CAM practitioners, and the public). Pharmacists asked more frequently about interactions while physicians asked more frequently about adverse effects (p? Conclusions General practice and community pharmacies are the main sources for questions about CAM to RELIS. Physicians are concerned about adverse effects while pharmacists are concerned about interactions. Lack of information to provide answers to patient-specific and general questions about CAM represents a problem.
机译:背景技术没有很好地描述向医疗保健专业人员提供有关补充和替代医学(CAM)的临床相关信息。该研究的目的是向挪威地区药品信息和药物警戒中心(RELIS)评估有关CAM的问题。方法从2005年至2010年,在RELIS数据库中以替代医学索引的所有问答对(QAP)构成研究材料。从问题类型(类别,患者特定或一般),询问者的职业和工作场所,执行的信息搜索类型(简单或高级)以及答案是否包含以下信息的特征中随机抽取100个QAP进行表征提供事实或咨询性答复(分别关于CAM临床使用的事实或建议)。将比例与费舍尔精确检验进行比较,显着性水平为0.05。结果13 482个问题中,有138个(7.7%)与CAM有关。每100个问题中有82个涉及包含一种或多种草药,维生素和矿物质以及其他物质的产品。在100个问题中,有38个涉及类别文档(有关临床疗效的物质识别和/或文献报告),36种相互作用,16种不良反应,9种妊娠和哺乳以及1个与禁忌症相关的问题。 63个问题是针对患者的,一般是37个。医师提出了54个问题,药剂师提出了33个问题,其他人(包括护士,助产士,学生,CAM从业者和公众)提出了13个问题。药剂师对相互作用的询问频率更高,而医师对不良反应的询问频率更高(p?结论一般实践和社区药房是有关CAM到RELIS的问题的主要来源。内科医生担心药物的不良反应,而药剂师则关注相互作用。提供有关CAM的患者特定和一般问题的答案表示一个问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号