首页> 外文期刊>Design and technology education: An international journal >A Comparison of Diary Method Variations for Enlightening Form Generation in the Design Process
【24h】

A Comparison of Diary Method Variations for Enlightening Form Generation in the Design Process

机译:设计过程中启发形式生成的日记方法变化的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper presents two studies in which an empirical approach was taken to understand and explain form generation and decisions taken in the design process. In particular, the activities addressing aesthetic aspects when exteriorising form ideas in the design process have been the focus of the present study. Diary methods were the starting point of this research for investigating the form generation process through collecting self-reflective comments from the participants. The main focus of this paper is to address potentials and limitations of the three variants of diary method used for data collection, namely, unstructured diaries, structured diaries and visual diaries. A set of method evaluation criteria was developed to compare the structure of the diary variants. By qualitative analysis of the results and comparison of the diary variants, strengths and weaknesses of each variant were identified. One of the prominent factors in the diary variants was pegged to be due to the logging delay after the occurrence of the activities.
机译:本文提出了两项​​研究,其中采用经验方法来理解和解释在设计过程中表单的生成和决策。特别是,在设计过程中将形式思想外部化时针对美学方面的活动一直是本研究的重点。日记方法是通过收集参与者的自我反省评论来调查表单生成过程的研究的起点。本文的主要重点是解决用于数据收集的三种日记方法的潜力和局限性,即非结构化日记,结构化日记和可视日记。开发了一套方法评估标准以比较日记变体的结构。通过对结果进行定性分析并比较日记变体,可以确定每种变体的优缺点。日记变体中的突出因素之一被认为是由于活动发生后的采伐延迟。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号