首页> 外文期刊>Desalination and water treatment >Application of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction as a simple assisted clean-up and preconcentration technique for GC/MS determination of selected PAHs extracted from sewage sludge by Soxhlet and ultrasound assisted extraction method
【24h】

Application of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction as a simple assisted clean-up and preconcentration technique for GC/MS determination of selected PAHs extracted from sewage sludge by Soxhlet and ultrasound assisted extraction method

机译:分散液-液微萃取作为一种简单的辅助净化和预浓缩技术,用于GC / MS测定索氏萃取和超声辅助萃取法从污水污泥中萃取的某些多环芳烃

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Herein, two different extraction methods (Soxhlet and ultrasound assisted extraction) along with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (as an assisted clean-up and preconcentration technique) were applied for the measurement of selected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in sewage sludge. The measurements were made using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The extraction efficiencies of the above-mentioned methods were investigated and subsequently compared. Briefly, high amounts of sludge were gently heat-dried and sieved and the resulting solids (5 g for the Soxhlet extraction and ultrasound assisted extraction each) were then subjected to the corresponding extraction method. To clean-up, after completion of the extraction phase, the extract was dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen and then diluted with acetone (1.5 ml) and finally passed through a PTFE syringe filter. Further on, tetrachloroethylene (C2Cl4, 12 mu l) was added to the acetone solution and the resulting mixture was rapidly added to a vessel containing deionized water (5.0 ml) for assisting the clean-up process and further preconcentration. Afterwards, the sedimented organic phase (5 +/- 0.5 mu l) was withdrawn and injected into the GC/MS (1.0 mu l) for identification and quantification of the PAHs. Some differences between the two methods were observed for reproducibility and limits of quantification and were determined to be insignificant and significant, respectively. Overall, Soxhlet extraction had better extraction efficiency compared to that of the Ultrasound assisted extraction for the PAHs.
机译:在此,两种不同的萃取方法(索氏萃取和超声辅助萃取)以及分散的液-液微萃取(作为辅助的净化和预浓缩技术)被用于测量污泥中选定的多环芳烃(PAHs)。使用气相色谱-质谱法(GC-MS)进行测量。研究了上述方法的提取效率,然后进行了比较。简而言之,将大量污泥轻轻加热干燥并过筛,然后将所得固体(用于索氏提取和超声辅助提取各5克)进行相应的提取方法。为了进行净化,在萃取阶段完成之后,将萃取物在温和的氮气流中干燥,然后用丙酮(1.5毫升)稀释,最后通过PTFE针筒式过滤器。进而,将四氯乙烯(C 2 Cl 4,12μl)加入到丙酮溶液中,并将得到的混合物迅速加入到装有去离子水(5.0ml)的容器中,以辅助净化过程和进一步的预浓缩。然后,取出沉淀的有机相(5 +/- 0.5微升),并注入GC / MS(1.0微升)中,以鉴定和定量多环芳烃。观察到两种方法之间在重现性和定量限方面存在一些差异,分别被认为是无关紧要和重要的。总体而言,与超声辅助提取PAHs相比,索氏提取具有更好的提取效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号