首页> 外文期刊>Desalination and water treatment >Comparison of different pretreatments for seawater desalination
【24h】

Comparison of different pretreatments for seawater desalination

机译:海水淡化不同预处理方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The performance of different processes applicable for seawater desalination pretreatment was evaluated in this study. These processes include dual media filter (DMF), pore controllable filter (PCF) and filter adsorber (FA). The particle removal performance was evaluated by turbidity, particle number (> 2 μm), SDI of the filtrate. The organic reduction performance was evaluated by COD, UV-254 and molecular weight distribution (MWD) of the filtrate. According to this study, PCF showed the best performance in the particle removal, while FA showed the best performance in the organic reduction. There were three peaks for raw seawater (180, 800, 28,000 Da) and the highest peak was recorded at 180 Da. All processes successfully reduced organic fraction of large MW (28,000 Da). FA reduced small fractions (180, 800 Da) better than DMF and PCF. FA was also good in the particle removal. The particle removal performance of FA was comparable to that of DMF. Both FA and DMF showed the similar behavior of initial breakthrough.
机译:在这项研究中评估了适用于海水淡化预处理的不同工艺的性能。这些过程包括双介质过滤器(DMF),孔可控过滤器(PCF)和过滤器吸附器(FA)。通过浊度,颗粒数(>2μm),滤液的SDI评价颗粒去除性能。通过COD,UV-254和滤液的分子量分布(MWD)评估有机还原性能。根据这项研究,PCF在去除颗粒方面表现出最好的性能,而FA在有机还原方面表现出最好的性能。原始海水有三个峰值(180、800、28,000 Da),最高峰值记录在180 Da。所有工艺均成功降低了大分子量(28,000 Da)的有机物含量。 FA比DMF和PCF更好地减少了小部分(180、800 Da)。 FA在颗粒去除方面也很好。 FA的颗粒去除性能与DMF相当。 FA和DMF都显示出类似的初始突破行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号