首页> 外文期刊>Water Research >A comparison of gravity-driven membrane (GDM) reactor and biofiltration + GDM reactor for seawater reverse osmosis desalination pretreatment
【24h】

A comparison of gravity-driven membrane (GDM) reactor and biofiltration + GDM reactor for seawater reverse osmosis desalination pretreatment

机译:重力驱动膜(GDM)反应器与生物滤池+ GDM反应器用于海水反渗透淡化预处理的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this study, permeate quality, membrane performance, and microbial community in a gravity-driven microfiltration (GDM) reactor and a biofiltration (BF) + GDM reactor for seawater reverse osmosis (RO) desalination pretreatment were compared at both lab-scale and pilot-scale. The presence of BF column was more efficient in removing soluble organic substances by biosorption/biodegradation, leading to superior permeate quality from BF + GUM and subsequently lower RO fouling than GDM. Compared to the biofilm-saturated anthracite media, the granular activated carbon media in BF improved the assimilable organic substances removal in BF + GDM. Although less organic substances and microbial cells were accumulated on the membrane in BF + GDM, its permeate flux was 10-20% lower than GDM. Furthermore, BF lowered the amounts and diversity of prokaryotes (due to less organic substances) and eukaryotes (due to BF media rejection and lacking of prokaryotic preys) in the membrane biofilm of BF + GDM, but did not cause significant shifts of predominant species. Thus, the lower flux in BF + GDM was attributed to the limited predation and movement of eukaryotes in membrane biofilm, which may result in the formation of less porous and compact biofilm layer. The cost analysis indicated that BF + GDM-RO requires 5.2% less operating cost and 1.5% less water production cost than GDM-RO. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在这项研究中,在实验室规模和试点中比较了重力驱动式微滤(GDM)反应器和用于海水反渗透(RO)淡化预处理的生物滤(BF)+ GDM反应器中的渗透物质量,膜性能和微生物群落。 -规模。 BF色谱柱的存在通过生物吸附/生物降解去除可溶性有机物的效率更高,从而导致BF + GUM的渗透物质量更高,RO结垢率也低于GDM。与生物膜饱和无烟煤介质相比,高炉中的颗粒状活性炭介质提高了高炉+ GDM中同化有机物的去除率。尽管在BF + GDM中膜上积累的有机物质和微生物细胞较少,但其渗透通量比GDM低10-20%。此外,BF降低了BF + GDM膜生物膜中原核生物(由于较少的有机物)和真核生物(由于BF介质排斥和缺乏原核生物的捕食)的数量和多样性,但并未引起主要物种的显着变化。因此,BF + GDM中较低的通量归因于真核生物在膜生物膜中的有限捕食和运动,这可能导致形成较少的多孔性和致密的生物膜层。成本分析表明,与GDM-RO相比,BF + GDM-RO的运行成本降低了5.2%,水的生产成本降低了1.5%。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water Research》 |2019年第1期|72-83|共12页
  • 作者单位

    Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore Membrane Technol Ctr, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, Singapore 637141, Singapore|Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore;

    Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore Membrane Technol Ctr, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, Singapore 637141, Singapore;

    Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore;

    KAUST, WDRC, Div Biol & Environm Sci & Engn BESE, Thuwal 239556900, Saudi Arabia;

    Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore Membrane Technol Ctr, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, Singapore 637141, Singapore|Univ Iceland, Fac Civil & Environm Engn, Hjardarhagi 2-6, IS-107 Reykjavik, Iceland;

    Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore Membrane Technol Ctr, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, Singapore 637141, Singapore|Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Biofiltration; Energy consumption; Gravity-driven microfiltration; Microbial community; Seawater pretreatment;

    机译:生物滤池;能耗;重力驱动微滤;微生物群落;海水预处理;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号