首页> 外文期刊>Denver Journal of International Law and Policy >Global and Going Nowhere: Sustainable Development, Global Governance & Liberal Democracy
【24h】

Global and Going Nowhere: Sustainable Development, Global Governance & Liberal Democracy

机译:全球和无处可去:可持续发展,全球治理和自由民主

获取原文
       

摘要

"How we decide and who gets to decide often determines what we decide."rnNearly one hundred years ago, Roscoe Pound discerned between "law in the books" and "law in action." Roscoe Pound was a Dean and Professor of Law at Harvard Law School. Prophesying the emergence of legal realism, Dean Pound was a pragmatist who was concerned that lawyers were hiding behind deductive models disconnected from reality. Pound also was a botanist. He understood that the sciences had long since abandoned such deductive modes of thinking in search of inductive reasoning and empirical verification. The "law in the books" was too often at variance with how the law actually unfolds in the real world. Lawyers were admonished by Pound not to behave as "legal monks," disconnected from the real world. Dean Pound worried about the application of unrealistic models of law and how they confounded the attainment of social justice in the United States, but his wisdom carries valuable lessons for today's international lawyers and policymakers who are busily constructing the global legal architecture ofrnsustainable development.
机译:“我们如何决定以及由谁决定,通常会决定我们做出什么决定。”一百年前,罗斯科·庞德(Roscoe Pound)在“法律规则”和“行动法律”之间做出区分。罗斯科·庞德(Roscoe Pound)是哈佛大学法学院院长兼法学教授。迪恩·庞德预言了法律现实主义的出现,他是一个实用主义者,他担心律师躲在与现实脱节的演绎模型后面。庞德也是植物学家。他了解到,科学早已放弃了这种演绎思维方式,以寻求归纳推理和经验验证。 “法律中的法律”常常与法律在现实世界中的实际发展方式不一致。庞德告诫律师不要表现出与现实世界脱节的“法律僧侣”。迪恩·庞德(Dean Pound)担心不切实际的法律模型的应用以及它们如何混淆美国的社会正义的实现,但他的智慧为当今忙于构建可持续发展的全球法律架构的国际律师和决策者提供了宝贵的经验教训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号