首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Repair bond strength of resin composite to restorative materials after short- and long-term storage
【24h】

Repair bond strength of resin composite to restorative materials after short- and long-term storage

机译:短期和长期存放后,修复树脂复合材料与修复材料的粘结强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives. To investigate short- and long-term bond strength ("repair bond strength"; RBS) of a resin composite to six restorative materials using either a silane and a bonding agent or a universal "one-step self-etch" adhesive system.Methods. Specimens were produced from an amalgam, a direct resin composite, two indirect resin composites, a hybrid ceramic, and a feldspar ceramic and stored for 3 months in tap water (37 degrees C). All specimens were then sandblasted (Al2O3; 25 mu m) and either treated with Monobond Plus and OptiBond FL Adhesive (MP-OFL) or with Scotchbond Universal (SBU). Filtek Z250 was used as "repair composite", and RBS was measured by means of a micro shear bond strength test after 24 h or after 1 year. RBS values (n = 15/group) were statistically analyzed (alpha = 0.05).Results. RBS (MPa; mean values (standard deviations)) after 24 h for MP-OFL: 18.6 (3.2)-23.9 (5.0) and for SBU: 12.5 (4.9)-18.1 (4.6); after 1 year for MP-OFL: 8.9 (4.6)-19.8 (4.3) and for SBU: 5.6 (2.3)-18.8 (3.5). After 24 h, MP-OFL showed significantly higher RBS to the hybrid ceramic and the feldspar ceramic than did SBU (p <= 0.0001) whereas there was no significant difference in RBS for the other four restorative materials. After 1 year, MP-OFL showed significantly higher RBS to the feldspar ceramic than did SBU (p = 0.043) whereas there was no significant difference in RBS for the other five restorative materials.Significance. The use of a silane and a bonding agent seems more versatile for repairing restorations than the use of a universal "one-step self-etch" adhesive system. (C) 2019 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:目标。使用硅烷和粘合剂或通用的“一步自蚀刻”粘合剂系统,研究树脂复合材料与六种修复材料的短期和长期粘合强度(“修复粘合强度”; RBS)。 。样品由汞合金,直接树脂复合材料,两种间接树脂复合材料,混合陶瓷和长石陶瓷制成,并在自来水(37摄氏度)中保存3个月。然后将所有样品喷砂(Al2O3; 25微米),并用Monobond Plus和OptiBond FL胶粘剂(MP-OFL)或Scotchbond Universal(SBU)处理。 Filtek Z250用作“修复复合材料”,RBS是在24小时或1年后通过微剪切粘结强度测试来测量的。统计分析RBS值(n = 15 /组)(alpha = 0.05)。 MP-OFL 24小时后的RBS(MPa;平均值(标准偏差)):MP-OFL:18.6(3.2)-23.9(5.0)和SBU:12.5(4.9)-18.1(4.6); 1年后MP-OFL:8.9(4.6)-19.8(4.3)和SBU:5.6(2.3)-18.8(3.5)。 24小时后,MP-OFL的杂化陶瓷和长石陶瓷的RBS显着高于SBU(p <= 0.0001),而其他四种修复材料的RBS没有显着差异。一年后,MP-OFL的长石陶瓷的RBS显着高于SBU(p = 0.043),而其他五种修复材料的RBS没有显着差异。与使用通用的“一步式自蚀刻”粘合剂系统相比,使用硅烷和粘合剂似乎更能修复修复体。 (C)2019牙科材料学院。由Elsevier Inc.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dental materials》 |2019年第9期|1205-1213|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Bern Dept Restorat Prevent & Pediat Dent Sch Dent Med Freiburgstr 7 CH-3010 Bern Switzerland;

    Univ Copenhagen Dept Odontol Sch Dent Norre Alle 20 DK-2200 Copenhagen Denmark;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Amalgam; Resin composite; Ceramic; Artificial aging; Adhesion;

    机译:汞合金;树脂复合材料;陶瓷;人工老化;附着力;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:32:59

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号