首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Color formulation and reproduction of opaque dental ceramic
【24h】

Color formulation and reproduction of opaque dental ceramic

机译:不透明牙科陶瓷的色彩配方和复制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and accuracy of mixing opaque feldspathic dental ceramic to obtain specific shades using two methods: (1) Concentration Additivity of Optical Parameters (CALAB) and (2) Concentration Additivity of Kubelka-Munk Optical Coefficients (CAK/S). Methods. A total of 25 opaque feldspathic dental ceramic specimens were fabricated by mixing six different pure shades in different concentrations. The reflectance spectra were measured and the actual CIELAB L~*, a~* and b~* coordinates were obtained for the 25 specimens. The CALAB and CAK/S methods were used to predict the L~*, a~* and b~* values with reference to the concentrations of the pure shades. Correlation analysis was carried out between the actual and predicted L~*, a~* and b~* values for both methods. The color differences (AP) between actual and predicted L~*, a~* and b~* values were also calculated and analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Results. Pearson's correlation coefficients between predicted and actual values for both methods were greater than 0.98. The mean ΔE~*s were 0.24 (0.11) for CALAB method and 0.21 (0.11) for the CAK/S method. The repeated measures ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference (P=0.0213) between the mean ΔE~*s from the two methods. Significance. Both methods produced mean ΔE~*s between the actual and predicted methods that were below the threshold of human perceptibility. The simpler CALAB method can be used to determine the opaque ceramic mixture for specific shades with accuracy.
机译:目标。这项研究的目的是使用两种方法确定混合不透明长石型牙科陶瓷以获得特定阴影的有效性和准确性:(1)光学参数的浓度加和(2)Kubelka-Munk光学系数的浓度加和( CAK / S)。方法。通过将六种不同浓度的纯净阴影混合在一起,总共制作了25个不透明的长石型牙齿陶瓷样品。测量反射光谱并获得25个样品的实际CIELAB L *,a *和b *坐标。参照纯色的浓度,使用CALAB和CAK / S方法来预测L〜*,a〜*和b〜*值。两种方法的实际和预测的L〜*,a〜*和b〜*值之间都进行了相关分析。还使用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)计算并分析了实际和预测的L〜*,a〜*和b〜*值之间的色差(AP)。结果。两种方法的预测值与实际值之间的Pearson相关系数均大于0.98。 CALAB方法的平均ΔE〜* s为0.24(0.11),而CAK / S方法的平均ΔE〜s为0.21(0.11)。重复测量方差分析表明,两种方法的平均值ΔE〜* s之间存在统计学上的显着差异(P = 0.0213)。意义。两种方法所产生的实际方法与预测方法之间的平均值ΔE〜* s均低于人类可感知的阈值。可以使用更简单的CALAB方法来准确确定特定阴影的不透明陶瓷混合物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号