首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Effect of pontic height on the fracture strength of reinforced interim fixed partial dentures
【24h】

Effect of pontic height on the fracture strength of reinforced interim fixed partial dentures

机译:桥高对增强型临时固定局部义齿断裂强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives. This in vitro study evaluated the fracture load of interim FPDs made with various materials and pontic heights. The hypothesis was that different materials and pontic heights result in different fracture resistance. Methods. Groups of interim FPDs were fabricated with prosthodontic resin materials on two abutments with two different pontic heights (4.3 and 5.8 mm) and a pontic width of 4 units (19 mm) (n = 3). The following materials were tested: (1) a thermoplastic polymer (Promysan Star~®), (2) Promysan Star~® with a veneering composite (Vita Zeta~®), (3) a non-impregnated polyethylene fiber reinforced resin (Ribbond~®) with a veneering composite (Sinfony~®), (4) an impregnated fiber reinforced composite system (Targis/Vectris~®), and (5) a conventional poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) (Biodent K+B, control group). After 5000 thermocycles, the FPDs were temporarily fixed with a provisional cement on the corresponding abutments and tested for fracture strength. One-way and two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni-Dunn's multiple comparison tests were performed for the statistical analysis (α = 0.05). Results. The mean fracture strength ranged from 83.0 to 625.9 N for a pontic height of 4.3 mm and from 97.2 to 893.7 N for a pontic height of 5.8 mm. Vectris~®/Targis FPDs of both pontic heights exhibited significantly superior fracture resistance compared to the corresponding Promysan, Promysan/Vita Zeta~®, Ribbond~®/Sinfony~® and Biodent groups. Except Biodent FPDs, fracture resistance of FPDs with a pontic height of 4.3 mm showed no significant differences compared to a pontic height of 5.8 mm for each material. Significance. Material type of the FPDs has a significant influence on the fracture strength, whereas pontic height has no significant effect (except control group).
机译:目标。这项体外研究评估了由各种材料和桥体高度制成的临时FPD的断裂载荷。假设是不同的材料和桥的高度导致不同的抗断裂性。方法。用两种树脂基台在两种不同的牙桥高度(4.3和5.8毫米),牙桥宽度为4个单位(19毫米)(n = 3)的情况下,用牙齿修复树脂材料制造临时FPD组。测试了以下材料:(1)热塑性聚合物(PromysanStar®),(2)具有饰面复合材料的PromysanStar®(VitaZeta®),(3)非浸渍聚乙烯纤维增强树脂(Ribbond) 〜®)与饰面复合材料(Sinfony®),(4)浸渍纤维增强复合材料系统(Targis /Vectris®)和(5)传统的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)(Biodent K + B,对照组) )。在进行5000次热循环之后,将FPD用临时水泥临时固定在相应的基台上,并测试其断裂强度。进行单向和双向方差分析和Bonferroni-Dunn的多重比较测试以进行统计分析(α= 0.05)。结果。对于4.3mm的桥体,平均断裂强度为83.0至625.9N,对于5.8mm的桥体平均断裂强度为97.2至893.7N。与相应的Promysan,Promysan / VitaZeta®,Ribbond®/Sinfony®和Biodent组相比,两个桥体高度的Vectris®/ Targis FPD均显示出明显优越的抗断裂性。除了Biodent FPD以外,与每种材料的5.8 mm的桥体高度相比,具有4.3 mm的桥体高度的FPD的抗断裂性没有显着差异。意义。 FPD的材料类型对断裂强度有显着影响,而桥体高度则无显着影响(对照组除外)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号