首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >The initiating radical yields and the efficiency of polymerization for various dental photoinitiators excited by different light curing units
【24h】

The initiating radical yields and the efficiency of polymerization for various dental photoinitiators excited by different light curing units

机译:不同光固化单元激发的各种牙科光引发剂的引发自由基收率和聚合效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: To evaluate the efficiency of the photopolymerization of dental resins it is necessary to know to what extent the light emitted by the light curing units is absorbed by the photoinitiators. On the other hand, the efficiency of the absorbed photons to produce species that launch the polymerization process is also of paramount importance. Therefore, the previously determined PAE (photon absorption efficiency) is used in conjunction with the polymerization quantum yields for the photoinitiators, in order to be able to compare the total process on an equivalent basis. This parameter can be used to identify the best performance for the photochemical process with specific photoinitiators. Methods: The efficiency of LED (Ultrablue IS) and QTH (Optilux 401) lamps were tested comparing their performances with the photoinitiators camphorquinone (CQ); phenylpropanedione (PPD); monoacylphosphine oxide (Lucirin TPO); and bisacylpho-sphine oxide (Irgacure 819). The extent of photopolymerization per absorbed photon was determined from the polymerization quantum yields obtained by using the photoinitiators to polymerize methyl methacrylate, and afterwards combined with the previously determined PAEs. Results: Although CQ presents a rather low polymerization quantum yield, its photopolymerization efficiency is practically the highest when irradiated with the Ultrablue LED. On the other hand, Lucirin is much more efficient than the other photoinitiators when irradiated with a QTH lamp, due to its high quantum yield and the overlap between its absorption spectrum and the output of the visible lamp light. Significance: Difference in photopolymerization efficiencies arise when combinations of photoinitiators are used, and when LED sources are used in preference to QTH. Mechanistic understanding is essential to optimal initiator formulation.
机译:目的:为了评估牙科树脂的光聚合效率,有必要知道光固化剂发出的光在多大程度上被光引发剂吸收。另一方面,被吸收的光子产生启动聚合过程的物质的效率也至关重要。因此,预先确定的PAE(光子吸收效率)与光引发剂的聚合量子产率结合使用,以便能够在等效基础上比较整个过程。该参数可用于识别使用特定光引发剂的光化学过程的最佳性能。方法:对LED(Ultrablue IS)和QTH(Optilux 401)灯与光引发剂樟脑醌(CQ)的性能进行了比较;苯丙二酮(PPD);一酰基氧化膦(Lucirin TPO);和双酰基膦氧化膦(Irgacure 819)。由所吸收的光子的光聚合程度由使用光引发剂使甲基丙烯酸甲酯聚合并随后与先前确定的PAE结合而获得的聚合量子产率来确定。结果:尽管CQ的聚合量子产率较低,但是当用Ultrablue LED照射时,其光聚合效率实际上是最高的。另一方面,由于其高量子产率以及其吸收光谱与可见光输出之间的重叠,Lucirin在用QTH灯照射时比其他光引发剂要有效得多。含义:当使用光引发剂的组合时,以及优先于QTH使用LED光源时,光聚合效率会发生差异。机械理解对于优化引发剂配方至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号