首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Effect of the composite photoactivation mode on microtensile bond strength and Knoop microhardness
【24h】

Effect of the composite photoactivation mode on microtensile bond strength and Knoop microhardness

机译:复合光活化方式对微拉伸键强度和努氏显微硬度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives. This study evaluated the effect of the composite photo-activation mode on microtensile bond strength and Knoop microhardness. Methods. Standard class I cavities (3x4x3 mm) were restored with two adhesives systems, Single Bond (SB) and Clearfil SE Bond (CE), and the TPH composite. The photoactivation of the composite was carried out using three modes: Conventional (CO: 400 mW/cm~2 x 40 s), Soft-Start (SS: 100 mW/cm~2 x 10 s + 600 mW/cm~2 x 30 s) and Pulse-Delay (PD: 100 mW/cm~2 x 3 s + 3 min wait + 600 mW/cm~2 x 37s). For the microtensile test, beams obtained from the buccal wall bond interface were tested under tension at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed until failure. For the microhardness test, the restorations were sectioned in the mesio-distal direction and indentations were made on the internal composite surface of each half at three different depths. Data of two tests were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and LSMeans (α = 0.05). Results. In the microtensile test, SS presented the highest values. PD presented intermediate values without differing significantly from the other modes. For adhesives, SB presented the highest values. In the microhardness test, PD presented the highest values, differing significantly from SS. CO presented intermediate values but without any statistical difference from the others. The SS-CE interaction presented the lowest values with statistical differences from all the others. Significance. By the SS technique, the highest bond strength was obtained. However, this technique made it possible for the adhesive system to intervene with the hardness of the composite.
机译:目标。这项研究评估了复合光激活方式对微拉伸粘合强度和努氏显微硬度的影响。方法。使用两种胶粘剂系统,单胶粘剂(SB)和Clearfil SE胶粘剂(CE)和TPH复合材料,恢复了标准的I类腔体(3x4x3 mm)。复合材料的光活化采用三种模式进行:常规模式(CO:400 mW / cm〜2 x 40 s),软启动(SS:100 mW / cm〜2 x 10 s + 600 mW / cm〜2 x 30 s)和Pulse-delay(PD:100 mW / cm〜2 x 3 s + 3分钟等待+ 600 mW / cm〜2 x 37s)。对于微拉伸试验,将从颊壁粘结界面获得的光束在拉力下以0.5 mm / min的十字头速度进行测试,直至失效。对于显微硬度测试,将修复体在近中方向上切开,并在每半个内部复合表面上的三个不同深度处进行压痕。使用双向方差分析和LSMeans(α= 0.05)分析了两次测试的数据。结果。在微拉伸试验中,SS呈现最高值。 PD呈现中间值,与其他模式无明显差异。对于粘合剂,SB给出了最高值。在显微硬度测试中,PD呈现最高值,与SS显着不同。 CO呈现中间值,但与其他值无任何统计差异。 SS-CE相互作用呈现最低值,与其他所有变量相比都有统计学差异。意义。通过SS技术,获得最高的结合强度。然而,该技术使得粘合剂体系有可能介入复合材料的硬度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号