首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions
【24h】

Effect of surface conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to composite after aging conditions

机译:表面处理方法对老化后树脂复合材料与复合材料微拉伸粘合强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives. This study evaluated the effect of two different surface conditioning methods on the repair bond strength of a bis-GMA-adduct/bis-EMA/TEGDMA based resin composite after three aging conditions.rnMethods. Thirty-six composite resin blocks (Esthet X, Dentsply) were prepared (5 mm × 6 mm × 6 mm) and randomly assigned into three groups for aging process: (a) immersion in citric acid (pH 3.0 at 37 ℃, 1 week) (CA); (b) boiling in water for 8h (BW) and (c) thermocycling (×5000, 5-55 ℃, dwell time: 30s) (TC). After aging, the blocks were assigned to one of the following surface conditioning methods: (1) silica coating (30 μm SiO_x) (CoJet, 3M ESPE) + silane (ESPE-Sil) (CJ), (2) phosphoric acid + adhesive resin (Single Bond, 3M ESPE) (PA). Resin composite (Esthet·X~®) was bonded to the conditioned substrates incrementally and light polymerized. The experimental groups formed were as follows: Grl:CA + PA; Gr2:CA + CJ; Gr3:BW + PA; Gr4: BW + CJ; Gr5:TC + PA; Gr6: TC + CJ. The specimens were sectioned in two axes (x and y) with a diamond disc under coolant irrigation in order to obtain non-trimmed bar specimens (sticks, 10 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm) with 1 mm~2 of bonding area. The microtensile test was accomplished in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed: 0.5 mm min~(-1)).rnResults. The means and standard deviations of bond strength (MPa± S.D.) per group were as follows: Grl: 25.5 ±10.3; Gr2: 46.3 ±10.1; Gr3: 21.7 ±7.1; Gr4: 52.3 ±15.1; Gr5: 16.1 ±5.1; Gr6, 49.6 ± 13.5. The silica coated groups showed significantly higher mean bond values after all three aging conditions (p < 0.0001) (two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests, a = 0.05). The interaction effect revealed significant influence of TC aging on both silica coated and acid etched groups compared to the other aging methods (p< 0.032). Citric acid was the least aggressive aging medium.rnSignificance. Chairside silica coating and silanization provided higher resin-resin bond strength values compared to acid etching with phosphoric acid followed by adhesive resin applications. Thermocycling the composite substrates resulted in the lowest repair bond strength compared to citric acid challenge or boiling in water.
机译:目标。这项研究评估了三种不同老化条件后两种不同的表面调节方法对bis-GMA加合物/ bis-EMA / TEGDMA基树脂复合材料修复结合强度的影响。准备了36个复合树脂块(Esthet X,Dentsply)(5 mm×6 mm×6 mm),并随机分为三组进行老化处理:(a)浸入柠檬酸中(pH值为37,在37℃下浸泡1周) )(CA); (b)在水中沸腾8h(BW)和(c)热循环(×5000,5-55℃,停留时间:30s)(TC)。老化后,将块分配给以下表面调节方法之一:(1)二氧化硅涂层(30μmSiO_x)(CoJet,3M ESPE)+硅烷(ESPE-Sil)(CJ),(2)磷酸+粘合剂树脂(Single Bond,3M ESPE)(PA)。树脂复合材料(Esthet·X®)逐渐粘合到已处理的基材上,并进行光聚合。形成的实验组如下:Gr1:CA + PA;和Gr2:CA + CJ; Gr3:BW + PA; Gr4:BW + CJ; Gr5:TC + PA; Gr6:TC + CJ。用冷却剂冲洗的金刚石盘在两个轴(x和y)上对样品进行切片,以获得粘结面积为1 mm〜2的未修整的棒状样品(棒,10 mm×1 mm×1 mm)。微拉伸试验在通用试验机上完成(十字头速度:0.5 mm min〜(-1))。每组的粘结强度的平均值和标准偏差(MPa±S.D。)如下:Gr1:25.5±10.3;和Gr:25.5±10.3。 gr2:46.3±10.1; Gr3:21.7±7.1; Gr4:52.3±15.1; Gr5:16.1±5.1; Gr6,49.6±13.5。在所有三个老化条件下(p <0.0001)(双向ANOVA和Tukey测试,a = 0.05),涂有二氧化硅的基团均显示出明显更高的平均键值。与其他老化方法相比,相互作用效应显示了TC老化对二氧化硅涂层和酸蚀基团均具有显着影响(p <0.032)。柠檬酸是侵蚀性最小的老化介质。相较于用磷酸进行酸蚀刻和随后的粘合树脂应用,椅面二氧化硅涂层和硅烷化提供了更高的树脂-树脂结合强度值。与柠檬酸激发或在水中沸腾相比,复合材料基材的热循环导致最低的修复结合强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号