首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: A comparative in vitro study
【24h】

Wear at the titanium-titanium and the titanium-zirconia implant-abutment interface: A comparative in vitro study

机译:钛-钛和钛-氧化锆植入物-基台界面的磨损:体外比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine and measure the wear of the interface between titanium implants and one-piece zirconia abutments in comparison to titanium abutments. Methods. 6 implants were secured into epoxy resin blocks. The implant interface of these implants and 6 corresponding abutments (group Zr: three one-piece zirconia abutments; group Ti: three titanium abutments) were examined by a microscope and scanning electron micrograph (SEM). Also the implants and the abutments were scanned by 3D-Micro Computer Tomography (CT). The abutments were connected to the implants and cyclically loaded with 1,200,000 cycles at 100 N in a two-axis fatigue testing machine. Afterwards, all specimens were unscrewed and the implants and abutments again were scanned by microscope, SEM and CT. The microscope and SEM images were compared, the CT data were superimposed and the wear was calculated by inspection software. The statistical analysis was carried out with an unpaired t-test. Results. Abutment fracture or screw loosening was not observed during cyclical loading. Comparing the microscope and SEM images more wear was observed on the implants connected to zirconia abutments. The maximum wear on the implant shoulder calculated by the inspection software was 10.2 μmfor group Zr, and 0.7 μm for group Ti. The influence of the abutment material on the measured wear was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.001; Levene-test). Significance. Titanium implants showed higher wear at the implant interface following cyclic loading when connected to one-piece zirconia implant abutments compared to titanium abutments. The clinical relevance is not clear; hence damage of the internal implant connection could result in prosthetic failures up to the need of implant removal.
机译:目的。这项研究的目的是确定和测量与钛基台相比,钛植入物和整体式氧化锆基台之间的界面磨损。方法。将6个植入物固定在环氧树脂块中。通过显微镜和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查了这些植入物和6个相应基台(Zr组:三个单件氧化锆基台; Ti组:三个钛基台)的植入物界面。植入物和基台也通过3D微型计算机断层扫描(CT)进行扫描。基台连接到植入物上,并在两轴疲劳测试机中以100 N的速度循环加载1,200,000个周期。然后,拧开所有标本,并再次用显微镜,SEM和CT扫描植入物和基台。比较显微镜和SEM图像,叠加CT数据,并通过检查软件计算磨损。使用不成对的t检验进行统计分析。结果。在周期性载荷下未观察到基台断裂或螺钉松动。将显微镜和SEM图像进行比较,观察到与氧化锆基台相连的植入物的磨损更大。通过检查软件计算出的Zr组在植入物肩部的最大磨损为10.2μm,Ti组为0.7μm。基台材料对测量的磨损的影响在统计学上是显着的(p≤0.001; Levene试验)。意义。与整体式钛基台相比,当与整体式氧化锆基台连接时,钛负载在循环加载后的界面处具有较高的磨损。临床相关性尚不清楚;因此,内部植入物连接的损坏可能会导致假体失败,直至需要移除植入物。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dental materials》 |2012年第12期|1215-1220|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Private Practice for Oral Surgery, Josef-Heilingbrunnerstr. 2, 93413 Cham, Germany,University of Munich, Department of Prosthodontics, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany;

    University of Munich, Department of Prosthodontics, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany;

    University of Munich, Department of Prosthodontics, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany;

    University of Munich, Department of Prosthodontics, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany;

    University of Cologne, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery and Implantology, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Cologne, Germany;

    University of Munich, Department of Prosthodontics, Goethestr. 70, 80336 Munich, Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    cyclic loading; fatigue testing; implant abutment; zirconia; titanium;

    机译:循环加载疲劳测试;种植体基台氧化锆钛;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:47:08

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号