首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >A 6-year prospective evaluation of a one-step HEMA-free self-etching adhesive in Glass Ⅱ restorations
【24h】

A 6-year prospective evaluation of a one-step HEMA-free self-etching adhesive in Glass Ⅱ restorations

机译:GlassⅡ修复体中一步法无HEMA自蚀刻胶的6年前瞻性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a one-step HEMA-free self-etching adhesive (SEA) placed with a micro-fine hybrid resin composite in Class Ⅱ restorations. The restorations were compared intraindividually with 2-step HEMA containing SEA-giomer restorations. Material and methods. Fifty-four patients with at least one pair of two similar Class Ⅱ cavities participated (30 men, 24 women; mean age 57.1 yrs). A total of 115 Class Ⅱ composite restorations were placed with (1) a one step HEMA-free adhesive and a micro-fine hybrid resin composite (Gbond/Gradia Direct: 60; GG) and (2) a 2-step HEMA-containing SEA and a giomer (FL Bond/Beautifil: 55; FB). Each participant received in a randomized way at least one restoration with each of the experimental materials. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and yearly during a 6 year followup using modified USPHS criteria. Results. During the 6 years, 111 restorations could be evaluated. No post-operative sensitivity was reported by the participants. Fourteen failed restorations (12.6%) were observed during the follow up, 5 GG (8.5%; 4 premolar and 1 molar teeth) and 9 FB (17.7%; 1 premolar and 8 molar teeth) (p < 0.05). Annual failure rate at 6 years were 1.4% for GB and 3.0% for FB. Main reasons of failure were bulk fracture of resin composite for FB and tooth fracture for GB. Significance. The HEMA-free SEA-hybrid RC restorations showed good clinical durability in Class Ⅱ cavities after 6 years. The HEMA-containing SEA-giomer restorations showed a rather high failure frequency.
机译:目的。这项研究的目的是评估在超细杂化树脂复合材料中放置一步法无HEMA的自蚀胶(SEA)在Ⅱ类修复物中的临床效果。将修复体分别与包含SEA-giomer修复体的2步HEMA进行了比较。材料与方法。至少有两个相似的Ⅱ类腔的一对的54例患者参加了试验(30名男性,24名女性;平均年龄57.1岁)。总共放置115种Ⅱ类复合材料修复体,其中(1)一种不含HEMA的粘合剂和一种超细混合树脂复合材料(Gbond / Gradia Direct:60; GG),以及(2)一种含两步HEMA的复合材料SEA和giomer(FL Bond / Beautifil:55; FB)。每个参与者以随机的方式接受了至少一种具有每种实验材料的修复体。使用修改后的USPHS标准在基线和每年6年的随访期间对修复进行评估。结果。在这6年中,可以评估111个修复体。参与者没有报告术后敏感性。随访期间观察到十四个失败的修复体(12.6%),其中5个GG(8.5%; 4个前磨牙和1个磨牙)和9个FB(17.7%; 1个前磨牙和8个磨牙)(p <0.05)。 GB的6年年故障率为1.4%,FB的年故障率为3.0%。失效的主要原因是FB的树脂复合材料整体断裂和GB的牙齿断裂。意义。 6年后,无HEMA的SEA混合RC修复体在Ⅱ类腔中显示出良好的临床耐久性。包含HEMA的SEA-giomer修复体显示出相当高的失效频率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号